Figure 6
The line graph is titled “Global Variations in Addressing Ethical Issues in Educational A I”. The horizontal axis is labeled “Year” and ranges from 2010 to 2020 in increments of 2 years. The vertical axis is labeled “Ethical Implementation Score” and ranges from 40 to 90 in increments of 10 units. A legend in the bottom left indicates that the graph plots five lines for different regions. The line labeled “North America” starts from (2010, 82.21), rises steeply to (2015, 95.38), drops slightly around (2016, 74.02), and ends higher at (2020, 91.27). The line labeled “Europe” starts from (2010, 68.96), rises to (2011, 87.69), then falls to (2012, 71.81), then peaks and maintains a relatively high and stable trend, then falls to (2017, 66.73), and terminates at (2020, 88.02). The line labeled “Asia” starts from (2010, 74.85), rises to (2012, 87.26), dips sharply around (2015, 58.09), fluctuates between 60 and 70 from 2016 to 2019, and ends at (2020, 50). The line labeled “Africa” starts from (2010, 58.17), rises gradually to (2012, 65.31), falls to (2016, 54.21), peaks near (2017, 79.67), dips to (2019, 42.13), and ends at (2020, 72.15). The line labeled “South America” starts from (2010, 55.06), rises steadily to (2012, 68.27), falls to (2013, 47.98), rises steadily to peak around (2017, 73.75), drops sharply to (2018, 47.84), and terminates at (2020, 49.34). Note: All numerical data values are approximated.Global variations in addressing ethical issues in educational AI Implementation Geographic visualisation depicting disparities in AI-ethics policy development and implementation across countries and educational systems, contrasting well-resourced systems with proactive policies and under-resourced contexts with limited guidance. Source: created by the author based on systematic literature review findings and bibliometric analysis (Holmes et al., 2022; Jobin et al., 2019; UNESCO, 2021)