Figure 3
The figure shows a grid of 12 vertical bar charts, arranged in 4 rows and three columns. Each chart has a different title at the top, consisting of a research article’s first author, year of publication, and short title. The vertical axis of each graph is labeled “Topic proportion” and ranges from 0 percent to 75 percent in increments of 25 percent. Nine bars are shown on each graph, corresponding to a research topic as shown in the legend at the bottom. The nine topics and their colors shown in the graph are “Sustainable, protean, boundaryless, and women’s careers (light blue)”, “Job insecurity, engagement, and proactive behaviours (dark blue)”, “Work-family dynamics and well-being (light green)”, “Recruitment and talent management (dark green)”, “Leadership and career change (pink)”, “Graduate employability, job search, and career choice (red)”, “Mentoring, relationships, and career development (light orange)”, “Expatriate careers and international adjustment (dark orange)”, and “Work identity and temporary or precarious employment (purple)”. The details of each graph are as follows: First row: AGARWAL U A, 2012, LINKING L M X, INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR AND TURNOVER INTENTIONS: The major bars are: Job insecurity, engagement, and proactive behaviours at 51 percent, Work-family dynamics and well-being at 31 percent, and Work identity and temporary or precarious employment at 14 percent. All the other bars have values between 0 to 5 percent. AL ARISS A, 2010, MODES OF ENGAGEMENT: The major bars are: Sustainable, protean, boundary less, and women’s careers at 75 percent and Expatriate careers and international adjustment at 18 percent. All the other bars have values between 0 to 3 percent. BACKHAUS K, 2004, CONCEPTUALIZING AND RESEARCHING EMPLOYER BRANDING: The major bar is Recruitment and talent management at 86 percent. All the other bars have values between 0 to 10 percent. Second row: BAKKER A B, 2008, TOWARDS A MODEL OF WORK ENGAGEMENT: The major bars are: Sustainable, protean, boundary less, and women’s careers at 10 percent, Job insecurity, engagement, and proactive behaviours at 69 percent, and Work-family dynamics and well-being at 15 percent. All other bars have values between 0 to 5 percent. BARUCH Y, 2004, TRANSFORMING CAREERS: The major bars are: Sustainable, protean, boundary less, and women’s careers at 36 percent, Recruitment and talent management at 14 percent, and Leadership and career change at 44 percent. All other bars have values between 0 to 5 percent. DEMEROUTI E, 2009, PRESENT BUT SICK: The major bars are: Job insecurity, engagement, and proactive behaviours at 39 percent and Work-family dynamics and well-being at 57 percent. All other bars have values between 0 to 5 percent. Third row: DONALD W E, 2018, STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF EDUCATION AND EMPLOYABILITY: The major bars are: Sustainable, protean, boundary less, and women’s careers at 27 percent and Graduate employability, job search, and career choice at 66 percent. All other bars have values between 0 to 5 percent. INKSON K, 2003, ’THE BIG OE’: The major bars are: Sustainable, protean, boundary less, and women’s careers at 72 percent and Expatriate careers and international adjustment at 20 percent. All other bars have values between 0 to 5 percent. MILLER A N, 2011, PUBLISH OR PERISH: The major bars are: Recruitment and talent management at 87 percent. All other bars have values between 0 to 8 percent. Fourth row: O’NEIL D A, 2005, WOMEN’S CAREER DEVELOPMENT PHASES: The major bars are: Sustainable, protean, boundary less, and women’s careers at 63 percent and Leadership and career change at 30 percent. All other bars have values between 0 to 5 percent. SCHAUFELI W B, 2009, BURNOUT: The largest bar is: Work identity and temporary or precarious employment at 96 percent. All other bars have values between 0 to 5 percent. VAN GELDEREN M, 2008, EXPLAINING ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTIONS BY MEANS OF THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOUR: The major bars are: Graduate employability, job search, and career choice at 55 percent and Expatriate careers and international adjustment at: 39 percent. All other bars have values between 0 to 5 percent. Note: All numerical values are approximated.Topic proportions by article. Source: Authors’ own creation. Note: The figure only shows the lead author of each manuscript (Agarwal et al., 2012; Al Ariss, 2010; Backhaus and Tikoo, 2004; Bakker and Demerouti, 2008; Baruch, 2004; Demerouti et al., 2009; Inkson and Myers, 2003; Miller et al., 2011; O’Neil and Bilimoria, 2005; Van Gelderen et al., 2008)