Figure 5
![The scatter diagram of geometry and attribute compression ratios from various inter-frame compression tools. The objective is to compare the disparities between the existing AVS dataset and our proposed dataset. We acquire the compression ratios through different approaches: (a) employs the MPEG Geometry Solid Test Model (GeS-TM) [17] inter-frame test software. (b) utilizes the MPEG G-PCC software with an intra-frame setting. (c) highlights the disparity in compression ratios between the existing AVS dataset and our proposed dataset by AVS PCRM. The red box corresponds to the existing dynamic point cloud sequences of AVS, while the remaining dots represent our proposed dataset. Refer to the image caption for details.](https://emer.silverchair-cdn.com/emer/content_public/journal/atsip/13/6/10.1561_116.20240031/2/116.20240031005.png?Expires=1782413054&Signature=OsQrz3cJK0IDc6U~o7-u94JJ2mTvKmYvOA1-weS4MWeObg0T-p2bzSap8n96FNPlLueV~Y-vB8a-paqQyAokdoHJtkl9vNstWArBc0YnNejU6ZPC2yn6Mha72QfWwhSFSGTL3HADNKITZoR5vWrkYnRreIMV-PFtFfe88OVtG3UsyWNO2B8CU9JYszPMBbhI5kRbfYCJ-ck3~ZB29DHOlw52k3AoykTHzhRIAKVqE--fH~fQ6XI5TYkdYBSlDAf1oOZRi7Hmmla224wQSdVW90JmcmTurB5HEt6-pNBMiYjOPWoEmIJYiZWTXfi7gCCm7Nyu2dBPZYbwqQIOenUtJw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA)
The scatter diagram of geometry and attribute compression ratios from various inter-frame compression tools. The objective is to compare the disparities between the existing AVS dataset and our proposed dataset. We acquire the compression ratios through different approaches: (a) employs the MPEG Geometry Solid Test Model (GeS-TM) [17] inter-frame test software. (b) utilizes the MPEG G-PCC software with an intra-frame setting. (c) highlights the disparity in compression ratios between the existing AVS dataset and our proposed dataset by AVS PCRM. The red box corresponds to the existing dynamic point cloud sequences of AVS, while the remaining dots represent our proposed dataset.