Figure 1
The path model shows the relationships between “Type of posts”, “Ad recognition”, “Ad irritation” and “Purchase intention”.The path model shows six rectangular boxes connected by solid and dashed arrows. At the bottom left, a box is labeled “Type of posts (candid versus curated)”. A solid arrow points diagonally upward to a box labeled “Ad recognition”, marked with “H2” and a negative symbol. From “Ad recognition”, a solid horizontal arrow points to a box labeled “Ad irritation”, marked with a plus symbol. A box labeled “Product involvement” is positioned at the top center and points down to this horizontal line, marked with “H 3”. From “Ad irritation”, a solid horizontal arrow points to a box labeled “Brand attitude (after-before)”, marked with a negative symbol. A solid arrow from “Product involvement” also points to this second horizontal line, marked with “H 4”. From “Brand attitude (after-before)”, a solid diagonal arrow points down to a box at the bottom right labeled “Purchase intention”, marked with a plus symbol. Several dashed lines originate from “Type of posts (candid versus curated)” at the bottom left. One dashed line points to “Ad irritation”, one to “Brand attitude (after-before)”, and one horizontal dashed line points directly to “Purchase intention”. From “Ad recognition” and “Ad irritation”, two dashed arrows point to the bottom right rectangular box “Purchase intention”. A text at the bottom reads “H 5”: “Type of posts” rightward arrow “ad recognition” rightward arrow “ad irritation” rightward arrow “brand attitude” rightward arrow “purchase intention”.

Conceptual model of Study 2. Source: Authors' own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal