Figure 3.
A bar graph shows perceived fit for restaurant types: fast food and local cuisine, comparing conditions for humans, humans assisted by robots, and robots.Long Description Text: The bar graph illustrates perceived fit ratings across two restaurant types: fast food and local cuisine. The x-axis represents restaurant type, featuring two categories, while the y-axis displays perceived fit scores, ranging from one to five. Three bars for each restaurant type depict different conditions: humans, humans assisted by robots, and robots. The bars for each condition are labelled with numerical values indicating the perceived fit score, accompanied by error bars demonstrating variability. The first bar for fast food indicates a perceived fit of four point fourteen for humans, followed by three point seventy-seven for humans assisted by robots, and three point eighty-four for robots. In local cuisine, the first bar shows four point thirty-seven for humans, three point seventy-one for humans assisted by robots, and three point forty-four for robots. The graph facilitates comparison within and between the restaurant types across the defined conditions.

The interaction effect on perceived fit in Study 1

Note(s): The error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval

Source: Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal