Figure 6
The diagram shows a text box on the left labeled “Meta competency group.” A right-pointing arrow from it, labeled “Derwik and Hallström, (2021),” connects to a text box labeled “Functional and Managerial competency group.” An arrow labeled question mark from “Meta competency group” extends right to three text boxes labeled “Functional and Managerial competency group,” “Cognitive competency group,” and “Relational competency group.” These three text boxes are connected by a double-headed arrow labeled question mark. A double-headed arrow labeled question mark connects “Functional and Managerial competency group” to a text box below labeled “Social or Behavioural competency group.” A double-headed arrow labeled question mark connects “Social or Behavioural competency group” to the “Relational competency group.” A double-headed arrow labeled question mark connects “Functional and Managerial competency group” to “Cognitive competency group”. Another double-headed arrow labeled question mark connects “Functional and Managerial competency group” to “Relational competency group”. Another double-headed arrow labeled question mark connects “Social or Behavioural competency group” to the “Cognitive competency group.” A double-headed arrow labeled question mark connects “Meta competency group” to “Relational competency group.” ” Another double-headed arrow labeled question mark connects “Meta competency group” to “Social or Behavioural competency group.” A double-headed arrow labeled question mark connects “Meta competency group” to “Cognitive competency group”.A proposed framework of relationship between individual competency groups. Source: Authors’ own work