Figure 5.
Four line charts compare raw and Linear Scaling adjusted tenth and ninetieth precipitation percentiles using multiple climate models.The first row compares raw and adjusted tenth percentiles of precipitation from observed data and climate models including A C C E S S C M 2, A C C E S S E S M 1.5, E C Earth 3, H a d G E M 3 G C 3 1 L, M I R O C E S 2 L, and M P I E S M 1.2 H R. The Linear Scaling adjustment smooths the data and aligns models closer to observations. The second row presents raw and adjusted ninetieth percentiles, showing improved consistency among models and reduced extreme precipitation variations after correction. The horizontal axis represents months from January to December, and the vertical axis represents precipitation in millimetres per day.

Performance of local intensity scaling (LIS) bias correction method applied on 10th and 90th percentiles of CMIP6 precipitation datasets in southern Ethiopia

Source: Figure by author

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal