Figure 2
The diagram shows a large rectangular framework titled “Dynamic capabilities supporting S C resilience”. On the left side, a vertical rectangular box is labeled “Impact of disruptions on S C s”, and inside it a rounded box is labeled “Disruption in the S C”. To the right, a boxed section labeled “Foundational” contains several oval shapes labeled “Security”, “Visibility”, “Integration and transparency”, “Collaboration”, and “Ability”, with a plus symbol. The oval “Ability” is connected to “Visibility”, “Integration and transparency”, and “Collaboration” with the lines. To the right of the foundational box, a boxed section labeled “Operational” contains ovals labeled “Agility”, “Flexibility”, “Capacity”, “Responsiveness”, and “Ability”. The oval “Ability” is connected to “Flexibility”, “Capacity”, “Responsiveness”, and “Agility” with the lines. Further to the right, a boxed section labeled “Transformational” contains ovals labeled “Redundancy”, “Adaptability”, and “Ability”. The oval “Ability” is connected to “Redundancy”, and “Adaptability” with the lines. On the far right, a vertical box is labeled “Advanced application of capabilities supporting S C resilience”, and inside it an oval is labeled “Modified operating S C”. At the bottom of the diagram, a wide rectangular box is labeled “Digitalisation supporting resilience”, and inside it a smaller rectangle is labeled “Set of digital tools”. Solid rightward arrows link Disruption in the S C” to “Foundational”, “Foundational” to “Operational”, “Operational” to “Transformational”, and “Transformational” to “Modified operating S C”, while vertical connector lines extend upward from the “Digitalisation supporting resilience” box and points to “Foundational”, “Operational”, and “Transformational” sections.Digital resilience capability architecture. Source: Own construction based on the literature and the case studies