Figure A1
The two graphs are arranged in a vertical series. In both the graphs, the horizontal axis lists four categories, from left to right as follows: “Unfair 25 percent,” “Fair 17 percent,” “Fin and Gov Fair 22 percent,” and “Average Fair 36 percent.” Each category has four vertical bars. A legend at the bottom indicates that the first bar represents “Gov agencies,” the second bar represents “Financiers,” the third bar represents “Clients,” and the fourth bar represents “Unions.” In the first bar graph, the vertical axis ranges from negative 2 to 2 in increments of 1 unit. The data for the four categories are as follows: For “Unfair 25 percent”: Gov agencies: negative 0.85; Financiers: negative 1.41; Clients: negative 0.17; Unions: negative 0.70. For “Fair 17 percent”: Gov agencies: 0.94; Financiers: 1.44; Clients: 0.62; Unions: 0.79. For “Fin and Gov Fair 22 percent”: Gov agencies: 0.24; Financiers: 0.67; Clients: negative 0.10; Unions: 0.02. For “Average Fair 36 percent”: Gov agencies: negative 0.00; Financiers: negative 0.11; Clients: negative 0.13; Unions: 0.09. In the second bar graph, the vertical axis ranges from 1 to 5 in increments of 1 unit. The data for the four categories are as follows: For “Unfair 25 percent”: Gov agencies: 1.96; Financiers: 1.32; Clients: 3.94; Unions: 2.08. For “Fair 17 percent”: Gov agencies: 4.23; Financiers: 5.00; Clients: 4.64; Unions: 3.85. For “Fin and Gov Fair 22 percent”: Gov agencies: 3.35; Financiers: 4.00; Clients: 4.00; Unions: 2.92. For “Average Fair 36 percent”: Gov agencies: 3.04; Financiers: 3.00; Clients: 3.97; Unions: 3.02.Standardized and unstandardized profile solution from subsample 2. Note. “Unfair” N = 50; “Fair” N = 34; “Fin & Gov Fair” N = 43; “Average Fair” N = 70. Source: Authors’ own work