Figure 1
The conceptual model is arranged from left to right with grouped participation forms on the left, a moderating construct at the top center, and an outcome variable on the right. On the left, a large rectangular boundary labeled “Participation Forms (P F)” contains three vertically stacked rectangles labeled “Individual Participation (I P)”, “H R Participation (H R P)”, and “Strategic Participation (S P)”. From each of these three rectangles, single-headed arrows extend toward the right to a rectangle labeled “Psychological contract breach (P C B)”. The arrow from “Individual Participation (I P)” is labeled “H 1”. The arrow from “H R Participation (H R P)” is labeled “H 2”. The arrow from “Strategic Participation (S P)” is labeled “H 3”. Above the central area, a separate rectangle labeled “Perceived organizational support (P O S)” is positioned. From this rectangle, three dashed arrows extend downward toward each of the three main relationship paths. The dashed arrow pointing toward the path between “Individual Participation ( I P)” and “Psychological contract breach (PCB)” is labeled “H 4”. The dashed arrow pointing toward the path between “HR Participation (H R P)” and “Psychological contract breach (P C B)” is labeled “H 5”. The dashed arrow pointing toward the path between “Strategic Participation (S P)” and “Psychological contract breach (P C B)” is labeled “H 6”.The research model. Source: Authors’ own elaboration