Figure 2
The flow diagram shows three vertical columns labeled “Objectives”, “Methods”, and “Results”, each containing three stacked boxes aligned by rows. Arrows connect boxes horizontally across columns and vertically within columns. In the left column “Objectives”, the top box reads “Indentifying influencing factors”. A downward arrow runs to the second box labeled “Selecting antecedent and outcome variables”. Another downward arrow runs to the third box labeled “f s Q C A analysis”. From the first box in “Objectives”, a horizontal arrow runs right to the first box in “Methods”, which reads “Literature review” and “Semi-structured interviews (12 experts)”. A vertical arrow runs downward to the second “Methods” box labeled “Questionaire Survey (25 experts)” and “B W M method”. Another vertical arrow runs downward to the third “Methods” box labeled “Questionaires (179)”, “Data calibration”, “Necessary conditions analysis”, “Sufficiency analysis”, and “Robustness test”. From each “Objectives” box, horizontal arrows run right to corresponding boxes in the “Methods” column. From each “Methods” box, horizontal arrows run right to corresponding boxes in the “Results” column. The first “Results” box reads “27 influencing factors for primary, intermediate and advanced stages”. A downward arrow runs to the second box labeled “6 antecedent variables for each stage and outcome variables”. Another downward arrow runs to the third box labeled “Multiple pathways and recommendations for each stage”.Research Design. Source: Authors’ own work