Figure 3
A line graph compares low and high preferences for ambiguity, showing avoidance coping across low and high career insecurity.The horizontal axis is marked with two categories: “Low Career Insecurity” on the left and “High Career Insecurity” on the right. The vertical axis is labeled “Avoidance coping” and ranges from 0.00 to 2.50 in increments of 0.50 units. The graph shows two lines: a dashed and a solid. A legend at the top labeled “Preference for ambiguity” identifies the solid line as “high” and the dashed line as “low”. The “high” preference for the ambiguity line begins at (Low Career Insecurity, 1.70) and increases slightly to end at (High Career Insecurity, 1.80). The “low” preference for ambiguity line begins at (Low Career Insecurity, 1.88) and increases more steeply to end at (High Career Insecurity, 2.27). Note: All numerical data values are approximated.

Preference for ambiguity as a moderator in the relationship between career insecurity and avoidance coping. Source: Authors' own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal