Figure 2
The radar chart compares two groups labeled “Higher” and “Lower” across 22 emotional and personality traits arranged clockwise around the chart. The traits are “Affectionate”, “Loving”, “Active”, “Disgusted”, “Tame dagger asterisk”, “Secure asterisk”, “Adventurous”, “Good dagger”, “Good-natured”, “Calm”, “Understanding”, “Enthusiastic”, “Happy”, “Interested”, “Mild”, “Free”, “Nostalgic”, “Satisfied”, “Aggressive”, “Guilty”, “Wild”, and “Worried”. Concentric grid rings range from 0.0 to 0.6 in increments of 0.1. The blue line with circular markers represents “Higher”, and the orange line with circular markers represents “Lower”. Small annotation letters “a” and “b” appear beside several plotted points. The values for the “Higher” and “Lower” groups are as follows, listed clockwise from “Affectionate”: Affectionate: Higher 0.14, Lower 0.13. Loving: Higher 0.19, Lower 0.18. Active: Higher 0.04, Lower 0.05. Disgusted: Higher 0.05, Lower 0.08. Tame dagger double asterisk: Higher 0.03, Lower 0.02. Secure asterisk: Higher 0.05, Lower 0.04. Adventurous: Higher 0.10, Lower 0.08. Good dagger: Higher 0.50, Lower 0.40. Good-natured: Higher 0.02, Lower 0.01. Calm: Higher 0.18, Lower 0.10. Understanding: Higher 0.12, Lower 0.08. Enthusiastic: Higher 0.06, Lower 0.08. Happy: Higher 0.10, Lower 0.12. Interested: Higher 0.14, Lower 0.18. Mild: Higher 0.16, Lower 0.22. Free: Higher 0.01, Lower 0.02. Nostalgic: Higher 0.00, Lower 0.01. Satisfied: Higher 0.22, Lower 0.25. Aggressive: Higher 0.03, Lower 0.02. Guilty: Higher 0.02, Lower 0.01. Wild: Higher 0.03, Lower 0.02. Worried: Higher 0.04, Lower 0.03. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.Emotion terms citation proportions between food neophobia groups (Higher: blue line, Lower: orange line). a, b different lower case letters are significantly different across food neophobia groups at 5% level according to Tukey’s HSD test. When letters are not shown, it means they are not significant. †indicates significant differences among samples within that emotion. * indicates significant interaction identified in the Analysis of Deviance