Figure 3.
The image depicts a structural equation model showing a central construct labelled E B M S U connected to constructs S R, O D, P E, S I, C D M, and R A. Construct S R connects to S R 1 with loading 0.89, S R 2 with loading 0.90, and S R 3 with loading 0.85, with error terms e 1 to e 3 and e 13. Construct O D connects to O D 1 with loading 0.76, O D 2 with loading 0.80, and O D 3 with loading 0.79, with error term e 14. Construct P E connects to P E 1 with loading 0.74, P E 2 with loading 0.83, and P E 3 with loading 0.79, with error term e 15. Construct S I connects to S I 1 with loading 0.85, S I 2 with loading 0.73, and S I 3 with loading 0.87, with error term e 16. Construct C D M connects to C D M 1 with loading 0.73, C D M 2 with loading 0.74, C D M 3 with loading 0.78, and C D M 4 with loading 0.70, with error terms e 17 to e 20. Construct R A connects to R A 1 with loading 0.81, R A 2 with loading 0.82, and R A 3 with loading 0.69, with error terms e 21 to e 23. Structural paths show S R to E B M S U with a coefficient of 0.83, O D to E B M S U with a coefficient of 0.84, P E to E B M S U with a coefficient of 0.80, and S I to E B M S U with a coefficient of 0.64. Additional relations show C D M to E B M S U with a coefficient of 0.69 and R A to E B M S U with a coefficient of 0.34, while R A also shows an association of 0.39.CFA with second-order factor of EBM source utilisation and theoretically related constructs
Source: Authors’ own work