Figure 2.
A comparison of 2 network diagrams at timepoint 1 and timepoint 2 with nodes W B, C L, C P, C W B, E C, L S, E W, P O fit, S D, S E, S U S, and T P.The comparison includes 2 network diagrams labelled timepoint 1 and timepoint 2. Each diagram contains 12 circular nodes labelled W B, C L, C P, C W B, E C, L S, E W, P O fit, S D, S E, S U S, and T P. Nodes are arranged in a circular layout and connected by multiple lines of varying thickness. In timepoint 1, thick connections appear between S E and E C, S E and L S, S U S and S E, W B and S D, W B and C P, and S E and P O fit. In timepoint 2, similar strong connections remain between S E and E C, S E and L S, S U S and P O fit, W B and S D, W B and C P, with slight changes in line thickness across other connections. The overall structure and node positions remain consistent between both timepoints.

Networks of sustainability, employee outcomes and key variables

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal