Figure 3
A path diagram shows L A R G, C S F s, and S S C M performance linking to multiple constructs with path coefficients.Long: The path diagram includes multiple circles, with the circle labeled “L A R G” having the value 0.767 positioned in the center and the circle labeled “S S C M Performance” having the value 0.695 positioned to its right (representing R²). To the left of “L A R G”, the circle labeled “Agile” having the value 0.816 is positioned at the upper left, the circle labeled “Lean “having the value 0.681 is positioned further to the left, the circle labeled “Resilient” having the value 0.796 is positioned to the right of “Agile”, and the circle labeled “Green” having the value 0.675 is positioned to the right of “L A R G” (representing R²). To the left of “C S F s”, three circles are vertically aligned from top to bottom labeled “Leadership commitment” having the value 0.727, “Government support” having the value 0.479, and “Capable H R” having the value 0.668 (representing R²). To the bottom right of “C S F s”, three circles are vertically arranged, labeled “Social practices” having the value 0.737, “I T infrastructure” having the value 0.700, and “Partnership trust” having the value 0.655 (representing R²). To the right of “S S C M Performance”, three circles are vertically arranged, labeled “Economical” having the value 0.786, “Environmental” having the value 0.677, and “Social” having the value 0.703 (representing R²). Each of these circles connects to its respective rectangular indicators: “Lean” connects to rectangles “Q 10”, “Q 11”, “Q 8”, and “Q 9” with coefficients 0.872, 0.896, 0.864, and 0.899; “Agile” connects to rectangles “Q 12”, “Q 13”, “Q 14”, “Q 15”, “Q 16”, “Q 17”, and “Q 18” with coefficients 0.864, 0.881, 0.855, 0.893, 0.857, 0.836, and 0.840; “Resilient” connects to rectangles “Q 19”, “Q 20”, “Q 21”, “Q 22”, “Q 23”, and “Q 24” with coefficients 0.863, 0.856, 0.869, 0.870, 0.873, and 0.810; “Green” connects to rectangles “Q 25”, “Q 26”, “Q 27”, “Q 28”, “Q 29”, and “Q 30” with coefficients 0.797, 0.885, 0.851, 0.900, 0.875, and 0.731. The circle “Leadership commitment” connects to rectangles “Q 31”, “Q 32”, “Q 33”, and “Q 34” with coefficients 0.914, 0.917, 0.928, and 0.934; “Government support” connects to rectangles “Q 35”, “Q 36”, “Q 37”, and “Q 38” with coefficients 0.843, 0.862, 0.861, and 0.844; “Capable H R” connects to rectangles “Q 39”, “Q 40”, “Q 41”, and “Q 42” with coefficients 0.825, 0.833, 0.799, and 0.835; “Partnership trust” connects to rectangles “Q 43”, “Q 44”, and “Q 45” with coefficients 0.880, 0.912, and 0.840; “I T infrastructure” connects to rectangles “Q 46”, “Q 47”, and “Q 48” with coefficients 0.918, 0.929, and 0.911; “Social practices” connects to rectangles “Q 49”, “Q 50”, “Q 51”, and “Q 52” with coefficients 0.881, 0.786, 0.889, and 0.822. The circle “Economical” connects to rectangles “Q 1”, “Q 2”, and “Q 3”, with coefficients 0.851, 0.842, and 0.893; “Environmental” connects to rectangles “Q 4” and “Q 5” with coefficients 0.908, and 0.901; “Social” connects to rectangles “Q 6”, and “Q 7” with coefficients 0.903, and 0.920. Structural paths among the main circles show that “L A R G” connect with diagonal arrows to “Agile”, “Resilient”, “Lean”, and “Green” with coefficients 0.904, 0.892, 0.825, and 0.821; “C S F s” connect with outward arrows to “Leadership commitment”, “Government support”, “Capable H R”, “Social practices”, “I T infrastructure”, and “Partnership trust” with coefficients 0.853, 0.692, 0.817, 0.859, 0.700, and 0.655; C S F s” connects upward to “L A R G” with the coefficient 0.876; “C S F s” connects rightward to “S S C M Performance” with the coefficient 0.387; “L A R G” connects rightward to “S S C M Performance” with the coefficient 0.474; “S S C M Performance” connects to “Economical”, “Environmental”, and “Social” with coefficients 0.886, 0.823, and 0.839.Measurement model assessment