Figure 7.
The matrix labelled 3 M A O presents 12 organisations as rows and 18 evaluation criteria as columns, followed by a Mobilization column. The organisations are A R S A, A C E S, C D I S S, C N Rede, E C R, E C L, E C C I, E G A's, H O S P, I P S S, U L S, and U C C I. The criteria include Prior Dom, Refor E C C I, Fom Artic, I n c r U D P A, Aum Vagas, Ac Mob Uten, Prior S M, Prior Pedi, Prior C P, Art Coor, Comp ator, Q l f Interv, Inv Form, Form Ator, Coop G o v, I n c Qual, Aval Pro Re, and Apo Fam C I. The cells contain decimal values representing mobilisation scores for each criterion. The Mobilisation column reports overall values ranging from 24.6 for H O S P to 74.7 for U C C I. At the bottom, summary rows labelled Number of Agreements, Number of Disagreements, and Degree Mobilisation show aggregated values for each criterion, with all disagreement values recorded as 0.Matrix of weighted valued positions of actors on objectives (3MAO)
Note: The matrix reflects actors’ mobilization capacity, combining the intensity of their positions with their relative influence within the system
Source: Own authorship based on MACTOR software results