Figure 1.
The conceptual framework shows 4 labelled sections connected by a horizontal arrow representing Guiding Cultural Logics between Sustainability on the left and Convenience on the right. The top left section, Constrained Embodiment, describes Teleoaffectivity as encountering the normative boundary of care that triggers principled containment of current practices, and Ontological Security as perceptions of risk reinforcement. The top right section, Negotiated Continuity, describes Teleoaffectivity as emotional and sensory attachments in current routines, and Ontological Security as moral licensing to preserve identity attachments. The bottom left section, Pro-Transition, describes Teleoaffectivity as rediscovering kinship ties through new practices, and Ontological Security as repairing a fractured self-narrative through adaptation of practice. The bottom right section, In-Reversal, describes Teleoaffectivity as weaponising ambivalence, and Ontological Security as surfacing ontologically bracketed routines.Practice states and the typology framework
Source: Authors’ own creation