Figure 2
The title reads “Average reduction of performance loss (multi-node disruption: red, single-node disruption: blue)”. The horizontal axis is labeled in percentages and ranges from 0 percent to 100 percent in increments of 10 percent. The vertical axis lists six network strategies from top to bottom: “Page Rank”, “Degree Centrality”, “Betweenness Centrality”, “Node Degree”, “Closeness Centrality”, and “Random”. For each strategy, two circular markers are displayed on the same horizontal line. One marker represents multi-node disruption, and the other represents single-node disruption, as indicated by the title legend. Percentage values are printed next to each marker. For “Page Rank”, the multi-node disruption value is 30.83 percent, while the single-node disruption value is 73.36 percent. For “Degree Centrality”, the multi-node disruption value is 29.03 percent, and the single-node disruption value is 72.25 percent. For “Betweenness Centrality”, the multi-node disruption value is 29.29 percent, and the single-node disruption value is 70.03 percent. For “Node Degree”, the multi-node disruption value is 28.75 percent, and the single-node disruption value is 69.37 percent. For “Closeness Centrality”, the multi-node disruption value is 24.94 percent, and the single-node disruption value is 62.8 percent. For “Random”, the multi-node disruption value is 13.93 percent, and the single-node disruption value is 34.44 percent.Average reduction of performance loss per node selection strategy across all considered MSOM networks