Figure 4.
The four graphs plot goal achievement from 0 to 100 across weekly timelines. The legend identifies specific reflection and unspecific reflection. Participant Anna has the learning goal, writing clear, client-focused texts based on scientific literature. Anna starts at 60 on week 3 Wednesday with doing or experimenting, stays at 60 on week 3 Wednesday with consulting information sources, decreases to 30 on week 3 Thursday with encountering difficulties, increases to 70 on week 3 Sunday with consulting information sources and doing or experimenting, stays at 70 on week 3 Sunday and week 4 Monday with interacting or discussing with others, rises to 90 on week 5 Thursday with reflecting or evaluation, and ends at 95 on week 5 Friday with learning from others. Participant Beate has the learning goal, improving information seeking skills. Beate increases from 30 on week 1 Friday to 30 on week 1 Sunday, 40 on week 3 Monday, 45 on week 3 Monday, 60 on week 3 Saturday, 60 on week 3 Saturday, 70 on week 4 Saturday, and 75 on week 4 Saturday, with activities including interacting or discussing with others, consulting information sources, doing or experimenting, and getting feedback. Participant Casper has the learning goal, making fast yet rational decisions during team meetings. Casper increases from 35 on week 2 Thursday with consulting information sources to 50 on week 2 Friday with reflecting or evaluation, 80 on week 3 Monday with consulting information sources, and 100 on week 3 Friday with interacting or discussing with others. Participant Dennis has the learning goal, improving writing skills for more concise reports. Dennis increases from 50 on week 2 Saturday with interacting or discussing with others to 55 on week 2 Saturday with doing or experimenting, 60 on week 3 Saturday with consulting information sources, 65 on week 3 Saturday with getting feedback, 85 on week 4 Saturday with doing or experimenting, and 90 on week 4 Saturday with getting feedback.Workplace learning activities and perceived goal achievement for four participants; cases in the left column are time-based (Anna and Casper) and in the right column event-based (Beate and Dennis)
Source: Authors’ own work