Figure 3.
The largest entries are sustainability reports with 24 at 6 per cent, sustainability reporting with 19 at 5 per cent, electric utilities with 14 at 4 per cent, environmental performance with 14 at 4 per cent, public sector with 13 at 4 per cent, environmental reporting with 12 at 3 per cent, publishing limited with 12 at 3 per cent, reporting initiative with 12 at 3 per cent, global reporting with 11 at 3 per cent, integrated reporting with 10 at 3 per cent, and sustainable development with 10 at 3 per cent. Smaller entries include reporting practices with 9 at 2 per cent, content analysis with 8 at 2 per cent, corporate environmental with 8 at 2 per cent, corporate social with 8 at 2 per cent, environmental disclosure with 8 at 2 per cent, voluntary disclosure with 8 at 2 per cent, water utilities with 8 at 2 per cent, corporate governance with 7 at 2 per cent, environmental disclosures with 7 at 2 per cent, research limitations implications with 7 at 2 per cent, sustainability performance with 7 at 2 per cent, social responsibility with 7 at 2 per cent, C S R report with 6 at 2 per cent, energy sector with 6 at 2 per cent, gas companies with 6 at 2 per cent, institutional environment with 6 at 2 per cent, stock exchange with 6 at 2 per cent, utilities sector with 6 at 2 per cent, utility companies with 6 at 2 per cent, electricity retailers with 5 at 1 per cent, environmental social with 5 at 1 per cent, initiative G R I with 5 at 1 per cent, integrated thinking with 5 at 1 per cent, panel data with 5 at 1 per cent, and public services with 5 at 1 per cent. The lowest entries each have 4 at 1 per cent, including C S R reports, electricity sector, findings reveal, firms voluntary, greenhouse gas, empirical research, energy companies, financial risk, integrated reports, local public, moral legitimacy, public accountability, reporting gap, and reporting practice.TreeMap – colour word occurrence measure