Figure 1
The diagram presents a flow of study identification and selection. The left section shows records identified from databases including Psyc I N F O n equals seven hundred seventy one, C I N A H L n equals seven hundred thirty four, M E D L I N E n equals two thousand twelve, Scopus n equals six hundred ninety five, and Web of Science n equals two hundred thirteen, with total n equals four thousand four hundred twenty five. Duplicate records removed before screening are n equals one thousand nine hundred fourteen. Records screened are n equals two thousand five hundred eleven. Records excluded after title and abstract screening are n equals two thousand three hundred eighty. Reports sought for retrieval are n equals one hundred thirty one, with none not retrieved. Reports assessed for eligibility are n equals one hundred thirty-one. Reports excluded are n equals one hundred eleven with listed reasons. Studies included in the review are n equals twenty, and reports of included studies are n equals six, giving total of n equals twenty-six. The right section shows records identified from references list n equals nine, reports assessed for eligibility n equals six, and reports excluded n equals three, with stated reasons.The PRISMA 2020 (Page et al., 2021) statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic review