Figure 8
Comparison table of quasi-static and dynamic compression behaviour for Onyx, GFF/Onyx, KFF/Onyx, and CFF/Onyx specimens at increasing strain levels.The table compares lattice compression behaviour for Onyx, G F F slash Onyx, K F F slash Onyx, and C F F slash Onyx specimens under quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions. Each material system is shown at strain levels of 0 percent, 15 percent, 30 percent, and 35 percent. The columns represent quasi-static and dynamic tests for each material type. The panels show progressive deformation, buckling, densification, and collapse of the wavy lattice structures as strain increases. The Onyx specimens display moderate deformation under quasi-static loading and more severe collapse under dynamic loading. Fibre-reinforced specimens, including G F F slash Onyx, K F F slash Onyx, and C F F slash Onyx, exhibit denser structural deformation patterns and varying collapse mechanisms depending on fibre type and loading condition. Dynamic loading panels generally show more fragmented and compacted lattice behaviour compared with quasi-static loading.

Comparison of the various deformation stages of the gyroid structure made of Onyx, GFF/Onyx, KFF/Onyx, and CFF/Onyx up to 35% strain under quasi-static and dynamic compression

Source: Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal