Figure 2.
An illustration compares multi stage, multi step, and two step numerical methods, showing how successive phase field profiles are involved in the approximation, and how this affects the areas of common refinement in the computational mesh.The illustration presents three panels illustrating different time integration approaches for a phase field variable phi as a function of the spatial coordinate x, with values ranging from minus 1 to 1. In the left panel, the multi stage method shows several intermediate profiles, labeled phi n to the power 1, phi n to the power 2, and phi n to the power 3, which equals phi n, progressing from the previous profile phi n minus 1. The red horizontal segments indicate incremental shifts in x during each internal stage. In the middle panel, the multi step method compares profiles phi n minus 3, phi n minus 2, phi n minus 1, and the current phi n, highlighting how information from multiple earlier steps contributes to the update. In the right panel, the two step method shows a simpler update using only phi n minus 1 and phi n, with a single larger shift along the x axis.

Illustration of the required area of mesh refinement (indicated in red) for a multi-stage time-integration method (left), a multi-step method (center) and a two-step method (right)

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options