Figure 4
A table comparing various scenarios based on energy performance, environmental impact, densification, green spaces, services, quality of use, diversification of housing, cost, social cohesion, and marketing and city policy.The table presents a comparison of ten different scenarios, each represented by a row. The columns categorize the scenarios based on energy performance, environmental impact, densification, green spaces, services, quality of use, diversification of housing, cost, social cohesion, and marketing and city policy. Each cell within the table is color-coded to indicate the ordinal level of each variant: green for high, yellow for medium, red for low, and brown for fixed descriptors. The table includes the following details: Scenario 1: Energy Label C, Medium Impact, 2 Floor addition, High addition of green spaces, Big Improvement, Small Improvement, Diverse housing supply, A little over budget, High social impact, In accordance with marketing and city policy.

ScenarioWizard interface displaying a reduced set of internally consistent scenarios generated through CIB analysis (scenarios 1–10). Each row represents a complete scenario configuration, with columns showing the selected variant for each descriptor. The color-coded cells indicate the ordinal level of each variant: green for high, yellow for medium, and red for low, and brown for the “fixed” descriptor. (Full scenario tableau can be found in Appendix C)

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options