Figure 9.
The scatter plot compares time in seconds per training epoch on the horizontal axis with memory in gigabytes on the vertical axis. Five methods are plotted. R o C L has a labelled score of 39.93 and appears at high memory with moderately high training time. A C L has a score of 44.23 and appears at intermediate memory and training time. A d v C L with P L has a score of 50.25 and appears at the highest memory and longest training time. Ours has a score of 51.15 and appears at the lowest memory and shortest training time. Ours plus P L has a score of 52.52 and appears at lower memory and intermediate training time.RA (%) versus computation time (in seconds per epoch) and memory cost (in gigabytes) by using different self-supervised AT methods where CIFAR-10 was used