The flowchart titled “Identification of studies via databases” is organized in three vertical sections labeled “Identification”, “Screening”, and “Included”. In the Identification section the left box labeled “Records identified from asterisk (Total n equals 319): Databases (n equals 283); Scopus n equals 190; W o S n equals 93; Other sources (Google Scholar, expert network) (n equals 36)” sends a right-pointing arrow to a box labeled “Records removed before screening: Duplicate records removed (n equals 55); Records removed for other reasons (n equals 17)”. A downward arrow beginning at the same “Records identified from asterisks” box leads to the next box in the “Screening” section labeled “Records screened (n equals 247)”, and from this “Records screened” box, a right-pointing arrow leads to a box labeled “Records excluded two asterisks (n equals 158)”. A second downward arrow starting from the “Records screened” box leads to a box labeled “Records sought for retrieval (n equals 89)”, which sends a right arrow to “Records not retrieved (n equals 23)”. A downward arrow starting from “Records sought for retrieval” connects to the next box labeled “Full-text articles assessed for eligibility (n equals 66)”, and a right-pointing arrow from this eligibility box leads to a box titled “Records excluded: Reason 1 (n equals 7) not consumer focus; Reason 2 (n equals 6) healthcare or medicine focus; Reason 3 (n equals 8) A I not in the paper or proposed solution; Reason 4 (n equals 1) no food focus in the paper; Reason 5 (n equals 5) no sustainability in the paper”. A final downward arrow beginning at the “Full-text articles assessed for eligibility” box leads to the last box in the Included stage labeled “Studies included in review (n equals 39)”.Summary of the literature selection process according to the PRISMA framework. The figure details the screening, inclusion, and exclusion steps of the systematic review, making transparent how the initial pool of studies was narrowed to the final set of articles analyzed. *Consider, if feasible to do so, reporting the number of records identified from each database or register searched (rather than the total number across all databases/registers). **If automation tools were used, indicate how many records were excluded by a human and how many were excluded by automation tools. Source: Authors’ own based on PRISMA 2020 flow diagram (Page et al., 2021). This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit: Link to the website