Figure 11.
A two-panel plot compares P S N R against b p p for U V G and M C L-J C V across six temporal concatenation methods.The left panel is U V G. The horizontal axis is b p p from about 0.04 to 0.13. The vertical axis is P S N R from 35.5 to 38.0. H M-16.26 rises from about 36.2 at 0.046 b p p to about 37.8 at 0.105 b p p. V C T rises from about 35.4 near 0.044 b p p to about 37.8 near 0.115 b p p. Hybrid-C A plus S e q C a t rises from about 36.1 near 0.044 b p p to above 38.0 near 0.11 b p p. Hybrid-C A plus C h a C a t rises from about 35.95 near 0.045 b p p to about 37.8 near 0.106 b p p. S w i n plus S e q C a t rises from about 35.97 near 0.049 b p p to about 37.76 near 0.109 b p p. S w i n plus C h a C a t rises from about 35.98 near 0.043 b p p to about 37.77 near 0.097 b p p. The right panel is M C L-J C V. The horizontal axis is b p p from about 0.06 to 0.16. The vertical axis is P S N R from 36.5 to 38.5. H M-16.26 rises from about 36.72 at 0.061 b p p to about 38.47 near 0.16 b p p. V C T rises from about 36.45 near 0.069 b p p to about 38.17 near 0.147 b p p. Hybrid-C A plus S e q C a t rises from about 36.72 near 0.063 b p p to about 38.50 near 0.158 b p p. Hybrid-C A plus C h a C a t rises from about 36.65 near 0.064 b p p to about 38.42 near 0.16 b p p. S w i n plus S e q C a t rises from about 36.65 near 0.068 b p p to about 38.20 near 0.145 b p p. S w i n plus C h a C a t rises from about 36.66 near 0.062 b p p to about 38.50 near 0.159 b p p.

R-D curve of the two different temporal concatenation methods applied to the best performing Hybrid-CA ATEM model and most lightweight ATEM-Swin model

Source: Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options