The illustration contains two horizontal SHAP force plots, stacked vertically, that explain the predictions for a single respondent's likelihood of having high awareness and high intention to adopt biophilic development. Each plot shows the contribution of different features, pushing the prediction from a “base value” to the final output f of (x). The top plot, labeled “(a) SHAP force plot for a respondent with high awareness of biophilic development,” shows the impact of features on a respondent's high awareness. Features that increase the predicted value are shown in blue, pushing the prediction to the right, while features that decrease it are in red, pushing to the left. The horizontal scale at the top ranges from 0.09227 to 0.9923. The base value for this prediction is approximately 0.4923, and the final output f(x) is approximately 0.81. The red features, pushing the prediction lower, are “A T 9 equals 3,” “S N 5 equals 3,” “S N 4 equals 3,” “A T 2 equals 3,” “S N 6 equals 3,” “A T 1 equals 3,” “SUBJECTIVE underscore NORM equals 3,” “ATTITUDE equals 3.222,” and “A T 4 equals 3.” The blue features, pushing the prediction higher, are “D 9 B equals 1” and “PERCEIVED equals 3.” The bottom plot, labeled “(b) SHAP force plot for a respondent with high intention to adopt biophilic development,” shows the impact of features on a respondent's high intention. The horizontal scale on the top ranges from 0.2006 to 0.8006. The base value for this prediction is approximately 0.47, and the final output f of (x) is approximately 0.8006. The red features, pushing the prediction lower, are “PERCEIVED equals 3.143,” “S N 4 equals 3,” “P C 2 equals 3,” and “SUBJECTIVE underscore NORM equals 3.” The blue features, pushing the prediction higher, are “D 9 B equals 1,” “D 2 Work E x p equals 36,” “D 1 Age equals 60,” “D 9 A equals 0,” “A T 3 equals 4,” and “ATTITUDE equals 4.111.” Below the two plots, a detailed description reads, “A T 9: Biophilic development adds flexibility and problem-solving.; S N 5: Engineers expect biophilic development.; S N 4: Thai design trends favour biophilic development.; A T 2: Biophilic development reduces environmental impact.; S N 6: Experts promote biophilic development.; A T 1: Biophilic development improves quality of life.; Subjective underscore Norms: subjective Norms domain; Attitude: attitude domain; A T 4: Biophilic development makes design more modern; D 9 B: considering biophilic design, but undecided on implementation.; Perceived: perceived behavioural control domain; P C 2: Biophilic development can be adapted to Thai context.; D 2 Work Exp: work experience; D 1 Age: age; D 9 A: non-consideration of biophilic design; A T 3: Biophilic development is worth the investment.”SHAP Force plots demonstrating feature contributions to predictions. AT9: Biophilic development adds flexibility and problem-solving.; SN5: Engineers expect biophilic development.; SN4: Thai design trends favor biophilic development.; AT2: Biophilic development reduces environmental impact.; SN6: Experts promote biophilic development.; AT1: Biophilic development improves quality of life.; Subjective_Norms: subjective Norms domain; Attitude: attitude domain; AT4: Biophilic development makes design more modern; D9B: considering biophilic design, but undecided on implementation.; Perceived: perceived behavioral control domain; PC2: Biophilic development can be adapted to Thai context.; D2 Work Exp: work experience; D1 Age: age; D9A: non-consideration of biophilic design; AT3: Biophilic development is worth the investment. Source: Authors’ own creation