Figure 6. The arrangement has three...

Figure 6.

An arrangement presents an assessment matrix of alternatives S1 to S8, rankings with dummy startups, and paired comparison relationships across criteria CR1 to CR5.

The arrangement has three parts. Section a shows an assessment matrix with criteria C R 1 to C R 5 against alternatives S 1 to S 8, where performance levels are marked as low, medium, or high. Section b shows rankings including dummy startups described as filled circle, empty circle, triangle, and diamond, with ordering of alternatives under each criterion C R 1 to C R 5. Section c lists paired comparison relationships across criteria. Alternatives are arranged in pairs such as S 1 with S 2 or S 4 with S 8, with relational results shown as less than, greater than, or similar under each criterion column C R 1 to C R 5.

Calculation of the $c_{i, j k}$ values (bolded) by combining the binary coefficients (⁠ $c_{i, j k}^{(>)}$ ⁠, $c_{i, j k}^{(\sim)}$ ⁠, $c_{i, j k}^{(<)}$ ⁠) obtained from the paired-comparison relationships, through equation (2). Next, the relevant p_jk values (in the last column) are calculated by applying equation (3)

Source: Figure created by authors

Sharing Unavailable