Figure 3
The horizontal axis has markings labeled from left to right as follows: “Opportunity Recognition without L L M Expert Evaluation,” “Opportunity Recognition with L L M Expert Evaluation,” “Opportunity Recognition without L L M Self Evaluation,” and “Opportunity Recognition with L L M Self-Evaluation.” The vertical axis has markings ranging from 1.00 to 7.00 in increments of 1.00 units. The data from the bars on the graph is as follows: Opportunity Recognition without L L M Expert Evaluation: Minimum: 1.23; Lower Quartile: 2.16; Median: 2.85; Upper Quartile: 3.73; Maximum: 4.74. Opportunity Recognition with L L M Expert Evaluation: Minimum: 3.07; Lower Quartile: 4.14; Median: 4.9; Upper Quartile: 5.46; Maximum: 6.19. Opportunity Recognition without L L M Self Evaluation: Minimum: 2.02; Lower Quartile: 4.6; Median: 5.5; Upper Quartile: 6.37; Maximum: 6.98. Opportunity Recognition with L L M Self-Evaluation: Minimum: 3.28; Lower Quartile: 4.87; Median: 5.5; Upper Quartile: 6.24; Maximum: 6.98. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.OR capability with and without LLM based on expert evaluation and Self-evaluation. Figure created by authors based on collected data