Figure 4
The horizontal axis has markings labeled from left to right as follows: “Opportunity Recognition without L L M Expert Evaluation,” “Opportunity Recognition without L L M Self Evaluation,” “Opportunity Recognition with L L M Expert Evaluation,” and “Opportunity Recognition with L L M Self-Evaluation.” The vertical axis has markings ranging from 1.00 to 7.00 in increments of 1.00 units. The data from the bars on the graph is as follows: Opportunity Recognition without L L M Expert Evaluation: Minimum: 1.25; Lower Quartile: 2.17; Median: 2.85; Upper Quartile: 3.73; Maximum: 4.73. Opportunity Recognition without L L M Self Evaluation: Minimum: 2.01; Lower Quartile: 4.62; Median: 5.49; Upper Quartile: 6.34; Maximum: 6.98. Opportunity Recognition with L L M Expert Evaluation: Minimum: 3.06; Lower Quartile: 4.14; Median: 4.89; Upper Quartile: 5.47; Maximum: 6.18. Opportunity Recognition with L L M Self-Evaluation: Minimum: 3.29; Lower Quartile: 4.85; Median: 5.51; Upper Quartile: 6.22; Maximum: 6.98. A vertical double-headed arrow between the median of the first and second box plots indicates a delta mean of 2.36. A vertical double-headed arrow between the median of the third and fourth box plots indicates a delta mean of 0.59. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.Comparison of expert evaluation and self-evaluation of OR capabilities. Figure created by authors based on collected data