Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

Management accounting researchers have borrowed eclectically from interpretive sociology. Such borrowing has been associated with ethnographic studies of accounting in action in particular organisational contexts. However, the eclectic nature of the borrowing has also resulted in little theory development and inconsistent arguments. Deeper theoretical and empirical analysis is required in order that testable, “universal” relationships about management accounting processes may be developed and investigated in the future.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal