The “new public management” (NPM) “reforms” have been extensive in the public sector in the UK. The paper’s primary focus is on the managerial and organizational effects of these accounting and finance‐led changes in the specific context of schools and GP practices. Central to the paper’s analysis and conclusion is the way that, in both these areas, many of the changes are perceived as unhelpful, intrusive and potentially dangerous for the nature of the core activities and values which underlie these organizations. The organizational effect of this dominant attitude is to develop appropriate “absorbing” mechanisms to “manage” these changing “disturbances” so that core activities and values remain unaffected. The paper develops, in two ways, the published analyses of these absorption processes: first, by providing a comparison over time of these absorption processes in schools and GP practices using a wider data set and second, by extending the analysis to show how these processes change as the nature of the “disturbances” shift and develop over time. The paper ends with a call for a wide‐ranging evaluation of the merit and worth of these “reforms” both generally and in the specific context of schools and GP practices.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 October 1998
Editors
Article Contents
Review Article|
October 01 1998
Resisting the “new public management”: Absorption and absorbing groups in schools and GP practices in the UK Available to Purchase
Jane Broadbent;
Jane Broadbent
School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, Surrey
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard Laughlin
Richard Laughlin
Department of Accounting, Finance and Management, University of Essex, Colchester
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-4205
Print ISSN: 1368-0668
© MCB UP Limited
1998
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (1998) 11 (4): 403–435.
Citation
Broadbent J, Laughlin R (1998), "Resisting the “new public management”: Absorption and absorbing groups in schools and GP practices in the UK". Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 No. 4 pp. 403–435, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579810231439
Download citation file:
1,204
Views
Suggested Reading
Whither British general practice after the 2004 GMS contract?: Stories and realities of change in four UK general practices
J Health Organ Manag (March,2008)
Rethinking schools and school leadership for the twenty‐first century: changes and challenges
International Journal of Educational Management (July,2002)
Clinical governance in primary care: from blind‐eye to no‐blame culture in one short leap?
British Journal of Clinical Governance (June,2001)
The Health Promoting School, general practice and the creative arts: an example of inter‐sectoral collaboration
Health Education (June,2000)
Braque to the future: the benefits of using a Cubist methodology to investigate the management of change
Management Research News (July,1998)
Related Chapters
Dynamic Conservatism: How Institutions Change to Remain the Same
Institutions and Ideals: Philip Selznick’s Legacy for Organizational Studies
Creating a Global Feminist Organization: Applying Theory to Practice
Gender and Practice: Knowledge, Policy, Organizations
How Schools Matter: The Need for a Contextual Perspective
Family Environments, School Resources, and Educational Outcomes
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
