This study examines the social and environmental disclosures of BHP Ltd (one of the largest Australian companies) from 1983 to 1997 to ascertain the extent and type of annual report social and environmental disclosures over the period, and whether such disclosures can be explained by the concepts of a social contract and legitimacy theory. This research is also motivated by the opportunity to compare and contrast results with those of Guthrie and Parker, in whose study the social and environmental disclosures made by BHP Ltd were also the focus of analysis. In testing the relationship between community concern for particular social and environmental issues (as measured by the extent of media attention), and BHP’s annual report disclosures on the same issues, significant positive correlations were obtained for the general themes of environment and human resources as well as for various sub‐issues within these, and other, themes. Additional testing also supported the view that management release positive social and environmental information in response to unfavourable media attention. Such results lend support to legitimation motives for a company’s social and environmental disclosures. A trend in providing greater social and environmental information in the annual report of BHP in recent years, and its variable pattern, was also evidenced.
Article navigation
1 August 2002
Editors
Literature Review|
August 01 2002
An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997: A test of legitimacy theory
Craig Deegan;
Craig Deegan
School of Accounting and Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Michaela Rankin;
Michaela Rankin
School of Accounting and Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
John Tobin
John Tobin
School of Accounting and Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-4205
Print ISSN: 1368-0668
© MCB UP Limited
2002
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (2002) 15 (3): 312–343.
Citation
Deegan C, Rankin M, Tobin J (2002), "An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997: A test of legitimacy theory". Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3 pp. 312–343, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435861
Download citation file:
12,385
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
The association between firm‐specific characteristics and disclosure: The case of Saudi Arabia
Managerial Auditing Journal (June,2006)
Interaction between compulsory and voluntary disclosure in Saudi Arabian corporate annual reports
Managerial Auditing Journal (April,2004)
The edge of legitimacy: Voluntary social and environmental reporting in Rothmans' 1956‐1999 annual reports
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (January,2010)
Grameen Bank's social performance disclosure: Responding to a negative assessment by Wall Street Journal in late 2001
Asian Review of Accounting (July,2009)
Gendered interactions in corporate annual report photographs
Gender in Management: An International Journal (March,2010)
Related Chapters
Intellectual capital disclosure of romanian listed companies
Accounting in Central and Eastern Europe
It Doesn’t Get Any Easier at the Top (At Least Not Yet)
Navigating Academia as a Neurodivergent Academic: Stories of Breaking and Rebuilding
Urgently accelerating change
Sustainable Infrastructure: Principles into Practice
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
