The auditor′s responsibility with respect to fraud has been one of the issues which has been associated most persistently with questions about the adequacy of audit performance. Examines the way in which the position of the accountancy profession in Britain on this subject developed during the 1980s – a period of considerable professional activity with respect to the issue of the auditor and fraud. While the profession has been persuaded to accept additional responsibilities concerning the reporting of detected fraud, it is argued that no such development has occurred with respect to the auditor′s responsibilities concerning fraud detection. The current nature of the auditor′s duties regarding fraud detection is seen as contestable. While further government action may force the profession to assume additional responsibilities in this respect, any such developments are seen as needing more detailed investigation of the precise capacities of audit practice in detecting (particularly management) fraud.
Article navigation
1 March 1993
Editors
Research Article|
March 01 1993
Protecting against Detection: The Case of Auditors and Fraud? Available to Purchase
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-4205
Print ISSN: 1368-0668
© MCB UP Limited
1993
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (1993) 6 (1)
Citation
Humphrey C, Turley S, Moizer P (1993), "Protecting against Detection: The Case of Auditors and Fraud?". Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1 pp. No Pagination Specified, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579310027512
Download citation file:
623
Views
Suggested Reading
Auditors' perception of fraud risk indicators: Malaysian evidence
Managerial Auditing Journal (January,2005)
An exploratory study of auditors’ responsibility for fraud detection in Barbados
Managerial Auditing Journal (April,2005)
Audit expectation gap: The case of Malaysia
Managerial Auditing Journal (September,2004)
The expectation gap: perceptual differences between auditors, jurors and students
Managerial Auditing Journal (April,2001)
Client size, auditor specialization and fraudulent financial reporting
Managerial Auditing Journal (June,2004)
Related Chapters
An Examination of the Perceptions of Auditors and Chief Financial Officers of Various Regulations Introduced by the Dodd–Frank Financial Reform Bill
Managing Reality: Accountability and the Miasma of Private and Public Domains
Religious Social Identity and Whistle-Blowing
Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting
Accounting Fraud, Audit Fees, and Government Intervention in China
Advances in Pacific Basin Business Economics and Finance
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
