IN order to appreciate how surface finish affects drag one must be familiar with the main characteristics of boundary layer flow. These have been described in great detail elsewhere, see, for example, Ref. 1, but a brief outline will not be out of place here. At the surface of a body moving through air there is a thin layer of air called the boundary layer in which the velocity relative to the body rapidly falls to zero as the surface of the body is approached. Because of the large velocity gradients across the boundary layer the viscous forces are appreciable there; outside the boundary layer the flow approximates closely to the ideal inviscid flow of classical hydrodynamics. The flow in the boundary layer beginning at the forward stagnation point is usually laminar for some distance, then after a transition region the flow becomes turbulent. The transition region is appreciable in extent at low Reynolds numbers and in turbulent airstreams, but at the Reynolds numbers usual in flight it is short enough to be referred to as a point. Wo now know enough about both laminar and turbulent types of flow over smooth surfaces and the associated frictional forces to be able to calculate with fair accuracy the profile and skin friction drags of a smooth aerofoil given its thickness, Reynolds number and the position of the transition points2. It is found that the skin friction in the laminar boundary layer is much smaller than the skin friction in the turbulent boundary layer; this is illustrated in Fig. 1, which shows the skin friction distribution on one side of a smooth flat plate at a Reynolds number of 107 and with the transition points at 05 c. and 25 c. Fig. 2 shows the variation of drag with the position of the transition point for the flat plate. Similar curves are obtained for aerofoils and bodies of revolution. It is evident that the further back transition occurs the less will be the drag. Fig. 3 illustrates a point that is worth emphasizing, namely, the relative importance of the drag change due to a given transition point movement increases with wing thickness and Reynolds number.
Article navigation
Review Article|
September 01 1939
Surface Finish and Performance: The Antipathetic Problems of Aerodynamic Refinement and Practical Construction
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2059-9366
Print ISSN: 0002-2667
© MCB UP Limited
1939
Aircraft Engineering (1939) 11 (9): 339–350.
Citation
Young A (1939), "Surface Finish and Performance: The Antipathetic Problems of Aerodynamic Refinement and Practical Construction". Aircraft Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 9 pp. 339–350, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb030537
Download citation file:
149
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
U.S. Patent Specifications
Aircraft Engineering (December,1957)
Angle of Attack Indicator: Details of the Ferranti Airstream Direction Detector System Which Can Be Used to Sense Angle of Attack or Angle of Sideslip
Aircraft Engineering (December,1960)
Aerodynamic models for cycloidal rotor analysis
Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology: An International Journal (March,2016)
SPEED OF DOCUMENT DELIVERY OVERSEAS: A COMPARATIVE SURVEY OF AIRSTREAM AND MULTIMAIL, FEBRUARY—APRIL 1987
Interlending & Document Supply (April,1987)
U.S. Patent Specifications
Aircraft Engineering (January,1959)
Related Chapters
Aerodynamic design of HS2 tunnels
High Speed Two (HS2): Infrastructure Design and Construction (Volume 1)
1 A brief survey of the aerodynamic stability problem of bridges
BRIDGE AERODYNAMICS
Aerodynamic Study of Cable Oscillations and Mitigation Measures for Long-Span Bridges
Bridge design, construction and maintenance: Proceedings of the two day international conference organised by the Institution of Civil Engineers and held in Beijing on 17–18 September 2007
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
