THE primary duties of an aircraft design team are to design an aircraft capable of meeting a certain specification of performance and manoeuvrability with suitable flying qualities, and to ensure that it will be strong enough to withstand any aerodynamic loads it may suffer in flight. It will be found that the aircraft when built is not a rigid structure, but this in itself is not important. We are all familiar with the flexing of an aircraft's wings when struck by a sharp gust of wind in flight, but as long as the wings are strong enough no harm is done. On the contrary, in a passenger aircraft the flexibility of the wings in bending will have a favourable effect, as it will cushion the passengers to some extent from the suddenness of the gust. Flexibility of the structure, however, is not always beneficial and it often introduces new difficulties in the designer's problems. These difficulties arise when the deformation of the aircraft structure introduces additional aerodynamic forces of appreciable magnitude. The additional forces will themselves cause deformation of the structure which may introduce still further aerodynamic forces, and so on. It is interactions of this type between elastic and aerodynamic forces which lead to the oscillatory phenomenon of flutter, and to the non‐oscillatory phenomena of divergence and reversal of control. The study of these three aero‐elastic problems becomes more important as aircraft speeds increase, because increase of design speeds leads to more slender aircraft with thinner wings, and therefore to relatively greater flexibility of the structure. The dangers, in fact, are such that the designers of a modern high‐performance aircraft have to spend considerable effort on the prediction of aero‐elastic effects in order that suitable safeguards can be included in the design. By far the greatest part of this effort is spent on flutter, which will be discussed in Parts II, III and IV of this series, but any of the three problems may force the designers to increase the structural stiffness of parts of the aircraft. The wing skin thickness on a modern aircraft, for example, is nearly always designed by consideration either of aileron reversal or wing flutter. Divergence is usually less important but as it is the simplest of the three phenomena to treat analytically, we shall study it first.
Article navigation
Review Article|
March 01 1954
The Elementary Theory of Aero‐Elasticity: A Series of Articles Written from the Standpoint of a Structural Engineer for Students and junior Members of Aircraft Design Teams
E.G. Broadbent, MA, A.F.R.Ae.S.
E.G. Broadbent, MA, A.F.R.Ae.S.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2059-9366
Print ISSN: 0002-2667
© MCB UP Limited
1954
Aircraft Engineering (1954) 26 (3): 70–79.
Citation
Broadbent E (1954), "The Elementary Theory of Aero‐Elasticity: A Series of Articles Written from the Standpoint of a Structural Engineer for Students and junior Members of Aircraft Design Teams". Aircraft Engineering, Vol. 26 No. 3 pp. 70–79, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb032400
Download citation file:
271
Views
Suggested Reading
Performance evaluations and junior auditors’ attitude to audit behavior: a gender and culture comparative study
Meditari Accountancy Research (September,2021)
Latent gaps in business education attaining globalisation in Taiwan
International Journal of Comparative Education and Development (August,2016)
Greening politics? European parties’ and European Parliament groups’ standpoints on sustainability (2019–2024)
Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal (November,2025)
A win-win scenario? Restrictive policies from alternative standpoints
J Health Organ Manag (November,2021)
British Food Journal Volume 12 Issue 6 1910
British Food Journal (June,1910)
Related Chapters
Indigenous standpoint and university corporate identity: transforming an organizational culture
Seeding Success in Indigenous Australian Higher Education
Standpoint: Using Bourdieu to Understand IE and the Researcher’s Relation with Knowledge Generation
Perspectives on and from Institutional Ethnography
Reflexivity and Praxis: The Redress of “I” Poems in Revealing Standpoint
Perspectives on and from Institutional Ethnography
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
