Although largely concerned with the military aspects of prolonged workload effects on aircrew and other personnel, certain topics discussed at a recent conference may have a wider application. One of the subjects dealt with concerned measures used by the USAF School of Aviation Medicine to evaluate crew fatigue in both airborne and ground operations. Self‐ratings have been used for collecting individual data from a large number of personnel. The checklist requires less than a minute to complete and results in a score ranging from 0–20 with lower figures indicating greater fatigue. Scores of 12 or above indicate feelings of alertness, 11 down to 8 moderate fatigue and 7 and below severe fatigue. There is some evidence to suggest that 7 to 4 may indicate performance impairment and below that degraded performance on complex tasks.
Article navigation
Review Article|
May 01 1984
Safety Topics
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2059-9366
Print ISSN: 0002-2667
© MCB UP Limited
1984
Aircraft Engineering (1984) 56 (5): 18–19.
Citation
Mayday (1984), "Safety Topics". Aircraft Engineering, Vol. 56 No. 5 pp. 18–19, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb035983
Download citation file:
96
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Safety Topics
Aircraft Engineering (August,1987)
Safety Topics
Aircraft Engineering (November,1986)
Psycho‐educational Design of the Aircrew Team Management Programme
Industrial and Commercial Training (June,1986)
Towards an architecture of organizational learning: Insights from French military aircrews
VINE (August,2012)
Safety Topics: Human Factors in the Cockpit
Aircraft Engineering (May,1989)
Related Chapters
Leader Development in the USAF and Thriving in the VUCA Ecosystem: VUCA Context, VUCA Prime, VUCA Change, and VUCA Leadership
Higher Educational Leadership in VUCA Contexts: Accessing VUCA Prime and Wisdom for Effective Leadership
2. UAV Human Factors: Operator Perspectives
Human Factors of Remotely Operated Vehicles
Leading High-Risk Teams in Aviation
Leadership Lessons from Compelling Contexts
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
