The enactment of Riegle‐Neal IBBEA in 1994 encouraged bank mergers and acquisitions. Empirical evidence indicates that large banks benefited from IBBEA enactment. However, there is little, if any, evidence of the impact of the act on small banks’ profitability relative to large banks. This study examines the impact of IBBEA on the performance of small banks in the period preceding and following IBBEA implementation. Evidence is presented that indicates the return on assets of small banks was significantly less than that of larger banks in the post‐IBBEA period. This is contrary to the results of the pre‐IBBEA period when small banks’ profitability was competitive with and in some cases even better than large banks’ profitability. It is concluded that the enactment of IBBEA has placed small banks at a competitive disadvantage which could eventually lead to their demise.
Article navigation
28 October 2005
This article was originally published in
Mid-American Journal of Business
Review Article|
October 28 2005
IBBEA Implementation and the Relative Profitability of Small Banks
Srinivas Nippani;
Srinivas Nippani
Texas A&M University‐Commerce
Search for other works by this author on:
Kenneth M. Washer
Kenneth M. Washer
Texas A&M University‐Commerce
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1935-522X
Print ISSN: 0895-1772
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2005
Mid-American Journal of Business (2005) 20 (2): 21–24.
Citation
Nippani S, Washer KM (2005), "IBBEA Implementation and the Relative Profitability of Small Banks". Mid-American Journal of Business, Vol. 20 No. 2 pp. 21–24, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/19355181200500008
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
