Human interaction gives rise to conflict. This paper addresses general characteristics of Korean and United States culture relative to conflict resolution. In general, in the United States, conflict resolution is characterized by a win‐lose philosophy. Americans approach disputes with an attitude that one party is wrong, one is right and the purpose of dispute resolution is to decide who is right. Americans also believe that though the legal system is time‐consuming and expensive it can (for the most part) determine right and wrong. As a general statement most Americans respect the legal system and the law, though they find the process of litigation time consuming and expensive. In general, Koreans approach disputes with an attitude that all parties are partly wrong and partly right. Disputes are to be resolved in indirect and nonconfrontational ways so that harmony is restored and the relationship between the parties returns to one of harmonious interaction. Koreans have little respect for the law and the legal system and tend to depend upon non‐legal techniques to resolve disputes.
Article navigation
28 October 2004
This article was originally published in
Mid-American Journal of Business
Review Article|
October 28 2004
Dispute Resolution in the Korean and US Markets: A Comparison
Nancy J. White;
Nancy J. White
Central Michigan University
Search for other works by this author on:
Jun Lee
Jun Lee
Hedrick Brothers Construction Company
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1935-522X
Print ISSN: 0895-1772
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2004
Mid-American Journal of Business (2004) 19 (2): 23–30.
Citation
White NJ, Lee J (2004), "Dispute Resolution in the Korean and US Markets: A Comparison". Mid-American Journal of Business, Vol. 19 No. 2 pp. 23–30, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/19355181200400009
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Social context and employment lawsuit dispute resolution
International Journal of Conflict Management (October,2016)
Reframing the Itaewon crowd crush: a systems analysis using Perrow’s framework
Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal (May,2025)
Book reviews edited by Chris Taylor : Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights: A Concise Guide for Businesses, Innovative and Creative Individuals
International Journal of Law and Management (May,2013)
Dispute resolution in corporate multi-tenanted property management: a case study
Journal of Corporate Real Estate (April,2014)
Dispute resolution patterns and organizational dispute states
International Journal of Conflict Management (February,2008)
Related Chapters
Treating Conflict: The Adoption of a Conflict Management system in a Hospital Setting
Managing and Resolving Workplace Conflict
The Development of A Dual System of Workplace Dispute Resolution in Large Australian Organisations
Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations
Workplace Dispute Resolution: What Guidance Does Existing Research Provide?
Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 2017: Shifts in Workplace Voice, Justice, Negotiation and Conflict Resolution in Contemporary Workplaces
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
