Agricultural markets for commodities have tended to be unstable with high variability in prices received by producers from year‐to‐year. These conditions have always made production planning very risky over time. For this reason and others, since 1933, the federal government has supported commodity prices in one fashion or another at or near break even. Support programs have put pressure on the annual federal deficits and subsequently have added to the national debt. This paper investigates the use of private agricultural options contracts as a price risk management tool. Use of put options was compared for four commodities to the use of forward pricing, the use of cash prices at harvest and the use of futures as commodity pricing strategies. Private put options were found to be a useful alternative to the use of government prices upports in some commodity situations. The paper suggests that the use of option contracts provides additional flexibility in price risk management and in dealing with uncertainty. This knowledge was found to be especially useful in light of current cuts in federal price supports in current federal budgeting activity.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
22 April 1991
This article was originally published in
Mid-American Journal of Business
Review Article|
April 22 1991
Agricultural Options As A Management Tool Available to Purchase
Philip Gregorowicz;
Philip Gregorowicz
Auburn University, Montgomery
Search for other works by this author on:
H. Dean Moberly
H. Dean Moberly
Auburn University, Montgomery
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1935-522X
Print ISSN: 0895-1772
© MCB UP Limited
1991
Mid-American Journal of Business (1991) 6 (1): 51–57.
Citation
Gregorowicz P, Dean Moberly H (1991), "Agricultural Options As A Management Tool". Mid-American Journal of Business, Vol. 6 No. 1 pp. 51–57, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/19355181199100009
Download citation file:
180
Views
Suggested Reading
Is Chinese or American maize price effective for trading and policy-making reference?
China Agricultural Economic Review (August,2014)
The impact of Wal-Mart Supercenters’ entry on incumbent supermarkets’ profit margins: A case study of fluid milk
China Agricultural Economic Review (February,2017)
Mismatch: Land reallocations, recovery land rental and land rental market development in rural China
China Agricultural Economic Review (April,2014)
Assessing Korean consumers' valuation for domestic, Chinese, and US rice: Importance of country of origin and food miles information
China Agricultural Economic Review (January,2014)
Impacts of the cross-Straits Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement on the grouper fish markets in Taiwan and mainland China : A stochastic simulation analysis
China Agricultural Economic Review (October,2014)
Related Chapters
Chapter 2 Commodity Price Volatility, Democracy, and Economic Growth
Economic Growth and Development
Continuing Conflict and International Prices of Commodities: Theory and Empirical Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa
Ethnic Conflict, Civil War and Cost of Conflict
Monetary Policy and the Copper Price Bust: A Reassessment of the Causes of the 1907 Panic
Research in Economic History
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
