This conference is an information system—you are the users and I am one of the documents that has been retrieved by the system operators. Each of you will ‘read’ up to six documents and will, I hope, discuss them with each other. The cost to each one of you is the £14 conference fee plus incidentals. Few of you will have met this cost yourselves, having persuaded your employers to foot the bill as well as giving you a day off to attend the conference, making a total cost of the order of £25 per organization. The conference organizers have controlled the finances and, like you, have chosen to expend energy on this exercise rather than some other activity. Three groups of people, the conference organizers, your organizations and yourselves, all have individual expectations and when the conference is over will assess to what extent these expectations have been met. The conference organizers will heave a sigh of relief before becoming involved in planning next year's conference, when they will take into account those of your views of this year's conference that they come to hear about. Your views, I suggest, will depend to a considerable extent on chance: the conversation you happened to have with the person sitting next to you at dinner; a train of thought stimulated by a discussion of one of the papers and, in the even longer term, the unforeseen connection between something a speaker said and a problem encountered a month later. As for the people who actually paid the money—some organizations require delegates to present formal reports when they return to work, and must rely on this method of assessing whether their money was well spent. As conferences continue to be organized for the exchange of information we must assume that they are worth‐while. I personally think they are, and though I hate to say so at this particular moment, there is clearly a lot of truth in the often heard general assessment: ‘It's not the papers you listen to, it's the people you meet.’ Incidentally, if this assessment is accurate, it is worth considering to what extent conferences are organized to meet this primary objective.
Article navigation
Review Article|
September 01 1971
COST‐EFFECTIVENESS Available to Purchase
ALAN GILCHRIST
ALAN GILCHRIST
Aslib Research and Development Department
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-3748
Print ISSN: 0001-253X
© MCB UP Limited
1971
Aslib Proceedings (1971) 23 (9): 455–464.
Citation
GILCHRIST A (1971), "COST‐EFFECTIVENESS". Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 23 No. 9 pp. 455–464, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb050299
Download citation file:
152
Views
Suggested Reading
Training, Learning and the Instructor's Role: Part 1. Learning and the Instructor's Role
Journal of European Industrial Training (March,1981)
Futures shock: LA calls for more paper
New Library World (February,1985)
Guest Column: Dress for success
Records Management Journal (March,1990)
Comment
New Library World (March,1978)
Servicescape navigation: A customer typology based on the wayfinding ability of Italian hospital visitors
The TQM Journal (June,2017)
Related Chapters
Staging an intervention in a virtual dystopia: The online fallout of the race, power and privilege forum and the removal of “Chief Illiniwek”
Studies in Symbolic Interaction
The Parasites (1935)
Luso-Anarchist Reader: The Origins of Anarchism in Portugal and Brazil
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
