There is no universal definition of In3formation Management (IM) despite numerous discussions over the last decade about the meaning, content and use of IM in many disciplines. This is not to say, however, that a concept of IM is not developing. Indeed, three types of definitions (two of which are not dissimilar) have so far emerged from the literature: existential (the origins and elements of IM), operational (management of the information resource for strategic corporate objectives) and hybrid manager (organizational response to developments in information technology). This may cause some confusion about the nature of pure IM, but the key is to realize that its roots and possible development lie in a number of disparate but converging professional fields.
Article navigation
Review Article|
September 01 1992
Information management in context Available to Purchase
Allan Taylor;
Allan Taylor
Department of Business Information Management, Napier University
Search for other works by this author on:
Stephen Farrell
Stephen Farrell
Department of Business Information Management, Napier University
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-3748
Print ISSN: 0001-253X
© MCB UP Limited
1992
Aslib Proceedings (1992) 44 (9): 319–322.
Citation
Taylor A, Farrell S (1992), "Information management in context". Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 44 No. 9 pp. 319–322, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb051292
Download citation file:
1,131
Views
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
