In the paper we extend some Hardy and Littlewood type inequalities on time scales for the function of n variables. Special cases of obtained results include generalized Wirtinger, Hardy and Littlewood type inequalities.

The discrete Hardy inequality [8] was proved and published by Hardy himself. It states that if (cn) is a sequence of non-negative real numbers which are not identically zero, then for every real number p>1⁠, one has that

The classical Hardy inequality [9] states that if f≥0 and integrable over any finite interval (0,r) and fd is integrable and convergent over (0,∞) then for d>1⁠,

(1)

equality holds if and only if f(r)=0 almost everywhere. Hardy inequality (1) has been generalized by Hardy himself in [11], where he exposed that, for any integrable function f(y)>0 on (0,∞) and d>1⁠, the following hold

(2)
(3)

Hardy and Littlewood [10] demonstrate the discrete versions of (2) and (3). In particular they proved that if d>1 and (pm) is a sequence of non-negative terms then

where N is a non-negative constant. Time scales calculus [12] was introduced in 1988 by the German mathematician Stefan Hilger, which unifies sums and integrals. Some extension of Hardy type inequalities on time scales can be found in [2–4].

S. H. Saker et al. [13] proved some Hardy and Littlewood type inequalities on time scales in the following form:

Theorem 1.1.

Let T be a time scale with a∈(0,∞)T and p,q>0 such that p/q≥2 and γ>1. Furthermore assume that g is a nonnegative and the delta integral ∫a∞tpq−γgp/q(t)Δt exists. Let

(4)

Then one gets

Theorem 1.2.

Let T be a time scale with a∈(0,∞)T and p,q>0 such that p/q≥2 and γ>1. Furthermore assume that g is a nonnegative function and the delta integral ∫a∞tpq−γgp/q(t)Δt exist. Let Λ(t) be as defined in (4). Then

Theorem 1.3.

Let T be a time scale with a∈(0,∞)T and p,q>0 such that p/q>1 and γ>1. Furthermore assume that g is a nonnegative function and the delta integral ∫a∞tpq−γgp/q(t)Δt exists. Let Λ(t) be as defined in (4). Then

Theorem 1.4.

Let T be a time scale with a∈(0,∞)T and p,q>0 such that p/q>1 and γ<1. Furthermore assume that g is a nonnegative and delta integral ∫a∞(σ(t))pq−γgp/q(t)Δt exists. Let

Then one gets

In this paper we extend results of Theorem 1.1 to Theorem 1.4 for the function of n variables.

In this section, we recall the following concepts from theory of time scales [5,7]. A time scale is an arbitrary, non empty closed subset of real numbers. Set of integers and Cantor set are examples of time scales, while rational numbers, complex numbers and open interval between 0 and 1 not time scales. Let T be a time scale, for t∈T⁠, forward and backward jump operators are defined by

respectively. The conventions for these operators are inf ϕ=supT and sup ϕ=infT⁠. If σ(t)>t⁠, then t is right-scattered and if ρ(t)<t⁠, then t is left-scattered. Points that are right-scattered and left-scattered at the same time are called isolated points.

If σ(t)=t⁠, then t is right-dense and if ρ(t)=t⁠, then t is left-dense. Points that are right-dense and left-dense at the same time are called dense points. The functions μ:T→ℝ,ν:T→ℝ defined by μ(t)=σ(t)−t and ν(t)=t−ρ(t) are called forward and backward graininess functions, respectively.

A function g:T→ℝ is said to be right-dense continuous (rd-continuous) provided g is continuous at right-dense points and at left-dense points in T⁠, left-hand limits exist and are finite. The set of all such rd-continuous functions is denoted by Crd(T)⁠. For any function g:T→ℝ⁠, the notation gσ(t) denotes g(σ(t))⁠. The delta derivative (also Hilger derivative) gΔ(t) exists if and only if for every ϵ>0 there exists a neighborhood U of t such that

Assume that h:T→ℝ⁠, if HΔ(t)=h(t)⁠, then the Cauchy (delta) integral of h⁠. defined by

Integration by parts formula [7, Theorem1.77]:

If a,b∈T and u,v∈Crd(T)⁠, then

(5)

Chain rule 1 [7, Theorem 1.90]:

Assume that f:ℝ→ℝ is continuously differentiable and suppose g:T→ℝ is delta differentiable. Then f og:T→ℝ is delta differentiable and

(6)

holds.

Chain rule 2 [7, Theorem 1.87]:

If f and g satisfy the conditions of Chain rule 1, Then f og:T→ℝ is delta differentiable and there exists c in the real interval [t,σ(t)] such that

(7)

Hölder’s inequality [7, Theorem 6.13]:

For continuous real-valued functions g:T→ℝ⁠, h:T→ℝ⁠, let a,b∈T⁠, p>1 and 1p+1q=1⁠, then

(8)

Fubini’s Theorem on time scales [6]:

Let (ψ, M,μΔ) and (Γ, N,λΔ) be two finite dimensional time scales measure spaces. If Λ:ψ × Γ→ℝ is a μΔ × λΔ-integrable function. The function ς(t2)=∫ψΛ(t1,t2)Δt1 exists for any t1∈Γ and ξ(t1)=∫Γ Λ(t1,t2)Δt2 exists for t2∈ψ⁠, then

(9)

We assume throughout that all the functions are non-negative and the integrals considered exist.

In this paper, we use the following notations. We assume that there exists constant ki>0 with

(10)

The following inequalities are used to prove next results.

(11)
(12)
Theorem 3.1.

Assume i∈{1,…,n},Ti is a time scale with ai∈(0,∞)Ti and γi>1, further assume g:[a1,∞)T1×⋯× [an,∞)Tn→ℝ+ is such that the delta integrals

∫∏i=1nai∞∏i=1n(ti)pq−γigp/q(t1,…,tn)Δti for any (t1,…,tn)∈[a1,∞)T1×⋯× [an,∞)Tn exist, define

(13)

then for p,q>0 and p/q≥2

(14)
holds, wherec˜r=cr p/q, cr=2p/q−2krγrγr−1.
Proof.

To prove the result, we use the principle of mathematical induction. For n=1 the statement is true by Theorem 1.1. Let the statement be true for 1≤n≤k⁠.

To prove the result for n=k+1⁠. The left-hand side of (14) can be written as,

(15)

Denote ∫ak+1∞(Λk+1σ1⋯σk+1)p/qtk+1γk+1Δtk+1=Ik+1⁠. Apply (5) with ∂Δtk+1u(tk+1)=1tk+1γk+1 and

vσk+1(tk+1)=(Λk+1σ1⋯σk+1)p/q by keeping fix (t1,…,tk)∈[a1,∞)T1 ×⋯× [ak,∞)Tk⁠.

(16)

where,

(17)

Use chain rule (6) and the fact that σk+1(sk+1)≥sk+1 to get

(18)

(10) together with (18) gives

Therefore

(19)

(17) together with (19) gives

(20)

From (13), (16), (17), (20), we have (note that uk+1(∞)=0 and Λk+1(t1,…,tk,ak+1)=0⁠)

(21)

Apply chain rule 1 (6) on the right-hand side of (21)

(22)

Use right part of (11) on the right-hand side of (22),

(23)

Substitute (23) into (21)

(24)

Since

(25)

Use (25) in (24)

(26)

Substitute (26) in (15)

(27)

Exchange integrals on right-hand side of (27) k -times by using (9)

(28)

Use the induction hypothesis with Λkσ1⋯σk in (28) for fixed tk+1∈Tk+1 and again apply (9) k-times to get

Hence

Hence by induction principle, the statement is true ∀ n∈ℕ⁠. □

Theorem 3.2.

Assume i∈{1,…,n}, Ti is a time scale with ai∈(0,∞)Ti and γi>1, further assume g:[a1,∞)T1 ×⋯× [an,∞)Tn→ℝ+ is such that the delta integrals ∫∏i=1nai∞∏i=1n(ti)pq−γigp/q(t1,…,tn)∏i=1n Δti exist. Let Λk(t1,…,tn) be defined in (13), then for p,q>0 and p/q≥2

(29)

holds.

Proof.

To prove the result, we use the principle of mathematical induction. For n=1 the statement is true by Theorem 1.2. Let the statement be true for 1≤n≤k.

To prove the result for n=k+1⁠. Proceed it as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 up to (21). Apply chain rule 1 (6) on the right-hand side of (21) yields

(30)

Use (11) on the right-hand side of (30),

use the fact σk+1(tk+1)≥tk+1

(31)

Since

(32)

Use (32) in (31) and substitute in (21) to get

(33)

Apply Hölder’s inequality on the right-hand side of (33) with indices p/q and p/(p−q)

After simplification, we get

(34)

Substitute (34) into (15)

(35)

Exchange integrals on right-hand side of (35) k -times by using (9)

(36)

Use the induction hypothesis for Λkσ1⋯σk in (36) for fixed tk+1∈Tk+1 and again apply (9) k times to get

Hence by induction principle, the statement is true ∀ n∈ℕ. □

Corollary 3.3.

As a special case of Theorem 3.2, when T1=⋯=Tn=ℝ, p/q=λ>1 and γi<1, (29) becomes the following Wirtinger type inequality

whereG(t1,…,tn) ≐∫∏i=1naitig(s1,…,sn) ∏i=1ndsi.

When γ1=⋯=γn=λ>1, we have another Hardy type inequality for function of n-variables

Remark 3.4.

Assume that T1=⋯=Tn=ℕ in Theorem 3.2, p/q=λ>1⁠, ai>1⁠, γi>1 for i∈{1,…,n}⁠, further assume that ∑m1=1∞…∑mn=1∞ gλ(m1,…,mn) is convergent. (29) becomes the following discrete Hardy and Littlewood inequality

Theorem 4.1.

Assume i∈{1,…,n}, Ti is a time scale with ai∈(0,∞)Ti and γi<1, further assume g:[a1,∞)T1 ×⋯× [an,∞)Tn → ℝ+ is such that the delta integrals ∫∏i=1nai∞∏i=1ntipq−γigp/q(t1,…,tn)∏i=1n​Δti exist. Let Λk(t1,…,tn) be defined in (13), then for p, q>0 and p/q>1

(37)

holds, where n is a positive integer.

Proof.

To prove the result, we use the principle of mathematical induction. For n=1 the statement is true by Theorem 1.3. Let the statement be true for 1≤n≤k⁠.

To prove the result for n=k+1⁠. Proceed it as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 up to (21). Apply the chain rule 2 (7) to get

where ck+1∈[tk+1,σk+1(tk+1)]⁠. Since

and σk+1(tk+1)≥ck+1⁠, one has that

(38)

Substitute (38) into (21)

(39)

Apply Hölder’s inequality on the right-hand side of (39) with indices p/q and p/(p−q)

After simplification, we get

(40)

Substitute (40) into (15)

(41)

Exchange integrals on right-hand side of (41) k -times by using (9)

(42)

Use the induction hypothesis with (Λkσ1⋯σk)p/q in (42) for fixed tk+1∈Tk+1 and again apply (9) k-times to get

Hence by induction principle, the statement is true ∀ n∈ℕ⁠. □

Corollary 4.2.

As a special case of Theorem 4.1, when T1=⋯=Tn=ℝ, p/q=λ>1 and γ1,…,γn<1, (37) becomes the following Wirtinger type inequality,

whereG(t1,…,tn) ≐∫∏i=1naitig(s1,…,sn)∏i=1n Δsi.

When γ1=⋯=γn=λ>1, we have the classical Hardy type inequality for function of n -variables

Corollary 4.3.

Assume that T1=⋯=Tn=ℕ in Theorem 4.1, p/q=λ>1, ai>1, γi>1 for i∈{1,…,n}, further assume that ∑m1=1∞⋯∑mn=1∞ gλ(m1,…,mn)​ is convergent. Note that in this case miσi(mi)=mimi+1 therefore 12 ≤ mimi+1 ≤ 1, and we get following discrete Hardy and Littlewood inequality

Remark 4.4.

Assume i∈{1,…,n}⁠, Ti is a time scale with ai∈(0,∞)Ti and γi<1⁠, further assume g:[a1,∞)T1 ×⋯× [an,∞)Tn→ℝ+ is such that the delta integrals ∫∏i=1nai∞∏i=1n σi(ti)pq−γi(σi(ti)ti)pq(γi−1) gnp/q(t1,…,tn)∏i=1n Δti exist. Let Λk(t1,…,tn) be defined in Theorem 3.1, then for p,q>0 and p/q>1

holds.

Proof. Replace left-hand side of (37) in Theorem 4.1 by

and proceed as in the proof of Theorem 4.1. □

Theorem 5.1.

Assume i∈{1,…,n}, Ti is a time scale with ai∈(0,∞)Ti and γi<1, further assume g:[a1,∞)T1×⋯× [an,∞)Tn→ℝ+ is such that the delta integrals ∫∏i=1nai∞∏i=1n(ti)pq−γigp/q(t1,…,tn)∏i=1nΔti exist. Let Λk(t1,…,tn) be defined in (13), then for p,q>0 and p/q≤2

(43)
Proof.

Proceed as in the proof of Theorem 3.2 and apply inequality (12) in (21) to get (43). □

Remark 5.2.

As a special case of Theorem 5.1, when T1=⋯=Tn=ℝ⁠, p/q=λ>1 and γ1,…,γn<1⁠, we have the following Hardy type inequality

Remark 5.3.

Assume that T1=⋯=Tn=ℕ in Theorem 5.1, p/q=λ>1⁠, ai>1⁠, γi>1 for i∈{1,…,n}⁠, further assume that ∑m1=1∞⋯∑mn=1∞ gλ(m1,…,mn) is convergent. In this case, (43) becomes the following discrete Hardy and Littlewood inequality

Theorem 6.1.

Assume i∈{1,…,n},Ti is a time scale with ai∈(0,∞)Ti and γi<1, further assume g:[a1,∞)T1×⋯× [an,∞)Tn→ℝ+ is such that the delta integrals ∫∏i=1nai∞∏i=1n(σi(ti))pq−γigp/q(t1,…,tn)∏i=1nΔti exist, for any (t1,…,tn)∈[a1,∞)T1 ×⋯× [an,∞)Tn, define

(44)

then for p,q>0 and p/q>1

(45)

holds, where n is any positive integer.

Proof.

To prove the result, we use the principle of mathematical induction. For n=1 the statement is true by Theorem 1.4. Let the statement be true for 1≤n≤k⁠.

To prove the result for n=k+1⁠. The left-hand side of (45) can be written as

(46)

Denote ∫ak+1∞Ωk+1p/q(t1,…,tk+1)σk+1γk+1(tk+1) Δtk+1=Ik+1⁠. Apply (5) with ∂Δtk+1v(tk+1)=1σk+1γk+1(tk+1) and u(tk+1)=Ωk+1p/q(t1,…,tk+1)⁠. Thus

(47)

where v(tk+1)=∫ak+1tk+11/σk+1γk+1(sk+1)Δsk+1⁠. Use chain rule (6) and the fact that σk+1(sk+1)≥sk+1 to get

which gives

(48)

Combine (47), (48) and use the facts Ωk+1(t1,…,tk,∞)=0⁠, v(ak+1)=0 to get

(49)

Apply chain rule 2 (7) to find

where, ck+1∈[tk+1,σk+1(tk+1)]⁠. Since

and ck+1≥tk+1⁠, one has that

(50)

Substitute (50) into (49)

(51)

Apply Hölder’s inequality on the right-hand side of (51) with indices p/q and p/(p−q) to obtain

After simplification, we get

(52)

Substitute (52) into (46)

(53)

Exchange integrals on right-hand side of (53) k-times by using (9)

(54)

Use the induction hypothesis for Ωk(t1,…,tk+1) in (54) instead for Ωk(t1,…,tk) for fixed tk+1∈Tk+1 and again apply (9) k times to get

Hence by induction principle, the statement is true ∀ n∈ℕ⁠. □

Corollary 6.2.

Under the conditions of Theorem 6.1, we get the following inequality

(55)
Proof.

The fact ∂n ΩnΔt1 ⋯ Δtn ≤0 implies

(56)

Now use (45) in (56) to get (55). □

Remark 6.3.

Consider T1=⋯=Tn=ℝ⁠, p/q=λ>1 and γ1,…,γn<1⁠, in Theorem 6.1. Denote G(t1,…,tn)=∫∏i=1nti∞g(s1,…,sn)∏i=1ndsi⁠. Thus, (45) takes the form

which can be considered as a generalization of Wirtinger’s inequality [1].

Remark 6.4.

As a special case of Theorem 6.1, assume that T1=⋯=Tn=ℕ⁠, p/q=λ>1⁠, a1=⋯=an=1 and γ1,…,γn<1⁠. In this case (55) becomes the following discrete Hardy and Littlewood inequality

Theorem 7.1.

Assume i∈{1,…,n},Ti is a time scale with ai∈(0,∞)Ti and γi<1, further assume g:[a1,∞)T1×⋯× [an,∞)Tn→ℝ+ is such that the delta integrals ∫∏i=1nai∞∏i=1n(σi(ti))pq−γigp/q(t1,…,tn)∏i=1nΔti exist, then for p,q>0 and p/q≤2. Then

(57)

Proof: Use (12) and proceed as in the proof of Theorem 6.1 to get (57). □

Remark 7.2.

In Theorem 7.1, when T1=⋯=Tn=ℝ⁠, p/q=λ>1 and γi<1⁠, (57) becomes the following Wirtinger type inequality,

where G(t1,…,tn) ≐∫∏i=1nti∞g(s1,…,sn)∏i=1ndsi⁠.

Remark 7.3.

In Theorem 7.1, assume that T1=⋯=Tn=ℕ⁠, p/q=λ>1⁠, a1=⋯=an=1 and γi<1⁠. (57) becomes the following discrete Hardy and Littlewood inequality

Declaration of Competing Interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.The publisher wishes to inform readers that the article “Multivariate Hardy and Littlewood inequalities on time scales” was originally published by the previous publisher of the Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences and the pagination of this article has been subsequently changed. There has been no change to the content of the article. This change was necessary for the journal to transition from the previous publisher to the new one. The publisher sincerely apologises for any inconvenience caused. To access and cite this article, please use Nosheen, A., Nawaz, A., Khan, K. A., Awan, K. M. (2019), “Multivariate Hardy and Littlewood inequalities on time scales”, Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 26 No. 1/2, pp. 245-263. The original publication date for this paper was 27/12/2019.

[1]
R.P.
 
Agarwal
,
M.
 
Bohner
,
D.
 
O’Regan
,
S.H.
 
Saker
,
Some Wirtinger-type inequalities on time scales and their applications
,
Pacific J. Math.
 
252
(
2011
)
1
–
26
.
[2]
W.
 
Ahmad
,
K.A.
 
Khan
,
A.
 
Nosheen
,
M.A.
 
Sultan
,
Copson, Leindler type inequalities of function of several variables on time scales
,
Punjab Univ. J. Math.
 
51
(
8
) (
2019
)
157
–
168
.
[3]
M.S.
 
Ashraf
,
K.A.
 
Khan
,
A.
 
Nosheen
,
Hardy-Copson type inequalities on time scales for the functions of n independent variables
,
Int. J. Anal. Appl.
 
17
(
2
) (
2019
)
244
–
259
, .
[4]
J.
 
Baric
,
R.
 
Bibi
,
M.
 
Bohner
,
A.
 
Nosheen
,
J.
 
Pecaric
,
Jensen inequalities and their applications on time scales
, in:
Element
,
Zagreb, Croatia
, (
2015
).
[5]
M.
 
Bohner
,
S.G.
 
Georgiev
,
Multivariable Dynamic Calculus on Time Scales
,
Springer Int. Publ. Switzerland
, (
2016
) .
[6]
M.
 
Bohner
,
A.
 
Nosheen
,
J.
 
Pecaric
,
A.
 
Younas
,
Some dynamic Hardy type inequalities on time scales
,
J. Math. Inequal.
 
8
(
1
) (
2014
)
185
–
199
.
[7]
M.
 
Bohner
,
A.
 
Petereson
,
Dynamic Equations on Time Scales; An Introduction with Applications
,
Birkhauser
,
Boston
, (
2001
).
[8]
G.H.
 
Hardy
,
Note on a theorem of Hilbert
,
Math. Z.
 
6
(
3–4
) (
1920
)
314
–
317
, .
[9]
G.H.
 
Hardy
,
Notes on some points in the integral caluclus, LX. An inequality between integrals
,
Messenger Math
.
54
(
1925
)
150
–
156
.
[10]
G.H.
 
Hardy
,
Notes on some points in the integral calculus
,
Messenger Math
.
57
(
1928
)
12
–
16
.
[11]
G.H.
 
Hardy
,
J.E.
 
Littlewood
,
Elementary theorems concerning power series with positive coefficients and moment constants of positive functions
,
J. Reine Angew. Math.
 
157
(
1927
)
141
–
158
.
[12]
S.
 
Hilger
,
Analysis on measure chains-a unified approach to continuous and discrete calculus
,
Results Maths
(
1990
)
18
–
56
.
[13]
S.H.
 
Saker
,
O’Regan Donal, Hardy and Littlewood Inequalities on time scales
,
Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc.
 
39
(
2
) (
2016
)
527
–
543
.
Published in the Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options