In the paper we extend some Hardy and Littlewood type inequalities on time scales for the function of variables. Special cases of obtained results include generalized Wirtinger, Hardy and Littlewood type inequalities.
1. Introduction
The discrete Hardy inequality [8] was proved and published by Hardy himself. It states that if is a sequence of non-negative real numbers which are not identically zero, then for every real number , one has that
The classical Hardy inequality [9] states that if and integrable over any finite interval and is integrable and convergent over then for ,
equality holds if and only if almost everywhere. Hardy inequality (1) has been generalized by Hardy himself in [11], where he exposed that, for any integrable function on and , the following hold
Hardy and Littlewood [10] demonstrate the discrete versions of (2) and (3). In particular they proved that if and is a sequence of non-negative terms then
where is a non-negative constant. Time scales calculus [12] was introduced in 1988 by the German mathematician Stefan Hilger, which unifies sums and integrals. Some extension of Hardy type inequalities on time scales can be found in [2–4].
S. H. Saker et al. [13] proved some Hardy and Littlewood type inequalities on time scales in the following form:
Let be a time scale with and such that and . Furthermore assume that is a nonnegative and the delta integral exists. Let
Then one gets
Let be a time scale with and such that and . Furthermore assume that is a nonnegative function and the delta integral exist. Let be as defined in (4). Then
Let be a time scale with and such that and . Furthermore assume that is a nonnegative function and the delta integral exists. Let be as defined in (4). Then
Let be a time scale with and such that and . Furthermore assume that is a nonnegative and delta integral exists. Let
Then one gets
In this paper we extend results of Theorem 1.1 to Theorem 1.4 for the function of variables.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we recall the following concepts from theory of time scales [5,7]. A time scale is an arbitrary, non empty closed subset of real numbers. Set of integers and Cantor set are examples of time scales, while rational numbers, complex numbers and open interval between and not time scales. Let be a time scale, for , forward and backward jump operators are defined by
respectively. The conventions for these operators are and . If , then is right-scattered and if , then is left-scattered. Points that are right-scattered and left-scattered at the same time are called isolated points.
If , then is right-dense and if , then is left-dense. Points that are right-dense and left-dense at the same time are called dense points. The functions defined by and are called forward and backward graininess functions, respectively.
A function is said to be right-dense continuous (rd-continuous) provided is continuous at right-dense points and at left-dense points in , left-hand limits exist and are finite. The set of all such rd-continuous functions is denoted by . For any function , the notation denotes . The delta derivative (also Hilger derivative) exists if and only if for every there exists a neighborhood of such that
Assume that , if , then the Cauchy (delta) integral of . defined by
Integration by parts formula [7, Theorem1.77]:
If and , then
Chain rule 1 [7, Theorem 1.90]:
Assume that is continuously differentiable and suppose is delta differentiable. Then is delta differentiable and
holds.
Chain rule 2 [7, Theorem 1.87]:
If and satisfy the conditions of Chain rule 1, Then is delta differentiable and there exists in the real interval such that
Hölder’s inequality [7, Theorem 6.13]:
For continuous real-valued functions , , let , and , then
Fubini’s Theorem on time scales [6]:
Let and be two finite dimensional time scales measure spaces. If is a -integrable function. The function exists for any and exists for , then
We assume throughout that all the functions are non-negative and the integrals considered exist.
In this paper, we use the following notations. We assume that there exists constant with
3. Hardy and Littlewood-type inequalities for p/q ≥ 2 and γ > 1
The following inequalities are used to prove next results.
Assume , is a time scale with and , further assume is such that the delta integrals
for any exist, define
then for and
To prove the result, we use the principle of mathematical induction. For the statement is true by Theorem 1.1. Let the statement be true for .
To prove the result for . The left-hand side of (14) can be written as,
Denote . Apply (5) with and
by keeping fix .
where,
Use chain rule (6) and the fact that to get
Therefore
Since
Hence
Hence by induction principle, the statement is true . □
Assume , is a time scale with and , further assume is such that the delta integrals exist. Let be defined in (13), then for and
holds.
To prove the result, we use the principle of mathematical induction. For the statement is true by Theorem 1.2. Let the statement be true for .
To prove the result for . Proceed it as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 up to (21). Apply chain rule 1 (6) on the right-hand side of (21) yields
use the fact
Since
Apply Hölder’s inequality on the right-hand side of (33) with indices and
After simplification, we get
Hence by induction principle, the statement is true . □
As a special case of Theorem 3.2, when , and , (29) becomes the following Wirtinger type inequality
where.
When , we have another Hardy type inequality for function of -variables
Assume that in Theorem 3.2, , , for , further assume that is convergent. (29) becomes the following discrete Hardy and Littlewood inequality
4. Hardy and Littlewood-type inequalities for p/q ≥ 1 and γ > 1
Assume , is a time scale with and , further assume is such that the delta integrals exist. Let be defined in (13), then for and
holds, where is a positive integer.
To prove the result, we use the principle of mathematical induction. For the statement is true by Theorem 1.3. Let the statement be true for .
To prove the result for . Proceed it as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 up to (21). Apply the chain rule 2 (7) to get
where . Since
and , one has that
Apply Hölder’s inequality on the right-hand side of (39) with indices and
After simplification, we get
Hence by induction principle, the statement is true . □
As a special case of Theorem 4.1, when , and , (37) becomes the following Wirtinger type inequality,
where.
When , we have the classical Hardy type inequality for function of -variables
Assume that in Theorem 4.1, , , for , further assume that is convergent. Note that in this case therefore , and we get following discrete Hardy and Littlewood inequality
Assume , is a time scale with and , further assume is such that the delta integrals exist. Let be defined in Theorem 3.1, then for and
holds.
Proof. Replace left-hand side of (37) in Theorem 4.1 by
and proceed as in the proof of Theorem 4.1. □
5. Hardy and Littlewood-type inequalities for p/q ≤ 2 and γ > 1
Assume , is a time scale with and , further assume is such that the delta integrals exist. Let be defined in (13), then for and
Proceed as in the proof of Theorem 3.2 and apply inequality (12) in (21) to get (43). □
As a special case of Theorem 5.1, when , and , we have the following Hardy type inequality
Assume that in Theorem 5.1, , , for , further assume that is convergent. In this case, (43) becomes the following discrete Hardy and Littlewood inequality
6. Hardy and Littlewood-type inequalities for p/q > 1 and γ < 1
Assume , is a time scale with and , further assume is such that the delta integrals exist, for any , define
then for and
holds, where is any positive integer.
To prove the result, we use the principle of mathematical induction. For the statement is true by Theorem 1.4. Let the statement be true for .
To prove the result for . The left-hand side of (45) can be written as
Denote . Apply (5) with and . Thus
where . Use chain rule (6) and the fact that to get
which gives
Apply chain rule 2 (7) to find
where, . Since
and , one has that
Apply Hölder’s inequality on the right-hand side of (51) with indices and to obtain
After simplification, we get
Hence by induction principle, the statement is true . □
Under the conditions of Theorem 6.1, we get the following inequality
The fact implies
Consider , and , in Theorem 6.1. Denote . Thus, (45) takes the form
which can be considered as a generalization of Wirtinger’s inequality [1].
As a special case of Theorem 6.1, assume that , , and . In this case (55) becomes the following discrete Hardy and Littlewood inequality
7. Hardy and Littlewood-type inequalities for p/q ≤ 2 and γ < 1
Assume , is a time scale with and , further assume is such that the delta integrals exist, then for and . Then
Proof: Use (12) and proceed as in the proof of Theorem 6.1 to get (57). □
In Theorem 7.1, when , and , (57) becomes the following Wirtinger type inequality,
where .
In Theorem 7.1, assume that , , and . (57) becomes the following discrete Hardy and Littlewood inequality
Declaration of Competing Interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.The publisher wishes to inform readers that the article “Multivariate Hardy and Littlewood inequalities on time scales” was originally published by the previous publisher of the Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences and the pagination of this article has been subsequently changed. There has been no change to the content of the article. This change was necessary for the journal to transition from the previous publisher to the new one. The publisher sincerely apologises for any inconvenience caused. To access and cite this article, please use Nosheen, A., Nawaz, A., Khan, K. A., Awan, K. M. (2019), “Multivariate Hardy and Littlewood inequalities on time scales”, Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 26 No. 1/2, pp. 245-263. The original publication date for this paper was 27/12/2019.
