Let p[1,r;t] be defined by where t is a non-zero rational number, r ≥ 1 is an integer and for |q| < 1. The function p[1,r;t](n) is the generalisation of the two-colour partition function p[1,r;−1](n). In this paper, the authors prove some new congruences modulo odd prime ℓ by taking r = 5, 7, 11 and 13, and non-integral rational values of t.
Using q-series expansion/identities, the authors established general congruence modulo prime number for two-colour partition function.
In the paper, the authors study congruence properties of two-colour partition function for fractional values. The authors also give some particular cases as examples.
The partition functions for fractional value is studied in 2019 by Chan and Wang for Ramanujan's general partition function and then extended by Xia and Zhu in 2020. In 2021, Baruah and Das also proved some congruences related to fractional partition functions previously investigated by Chan and Wang. In this sequel, some congruences are proved for two-colour partitions in this paper. The results presented in the paper are original.
1. Introduction
A partition of a positive integer n is a non-increasing sequence of positive integers called parts, whose sum equals n. The number of partition of a non-negative integer n is usually denoted by p(n) with p(0) = 1. The generating function of p(n) (due to Euler) is given by
where for any complex number a,
For convenience, for any positive integer r, we write
Ramanujan [1, 2] found following three beautiful congruences modulo 5, 7 and 11 for the partition function p(n):
and
In a letter to Hardy written from Fitzroy House late in 1918 [3, pp. 192–193], Ramanujan introduced the general partition function pt(n) for any non-negative integer n and non-zero integer t as
For t = 1, p1(n) is the usual unrestricted partition function p(n) defined in (1.1). Ramanujan [3] further claimed that, if λ is a positive integer and is a prime of the form 6λ − 1, then
After Ramanujan, the congruence properties of the partition function pt(n) have been studied by many authors. For some recent works on pt(n) , we refer to [4–13] and references therein.
Chan and Wang [14] studied the partition function pt(n) for non-integral rational values of t and found many congruences. This paper closely follows the techniques of Chan and Wang. Xia and Zhu [15] proved many of the congruences conjectured in [14]. Recently, Baruah and Das [16] proved some new families of congruences modulo powers of primes for pt(n) for non-integral rational values of t. Baruah and Das [16] also investigated another general partition function p[1,r;t](n) which is defined by
for non-integral fractional values of t. The partition function p[1,r;t](n) is the generalisation of the two-colour partition function p[1,r;−1](n) , one of the colours appears only in parts that are multiples of r. The partition function p[1,r;−1](n) and other related functions have been studied by many authors. We refer [17–24] and references therein for details.
In [16], Baruah and Das established three congruences for p[1,r;t](n) by taking r = 2, 3 and 4, and t = −a/b with gcd(a, b) = 1. For example, Baruah and Das [16, Theorem 1.13] proved that:
(Baruah & Das) [16, Theorem 1.13] Suppose , b ≥ 1 and gcd(a, b) = 1. Let ℓ be an odd prime divisor of a + db and 0 ≤ r < ℓ. Suppose d, ℓ and r satisfy the following conditions: d = 3, ℓ ≡ 5 or 11 (mod 12) and 2r + 1 ≡ 0 (mod ℓ). Then for all n ≥ 0,
In this paper, we will prove four new congruences for p[1,r;t](n) modulo an odd prime ℓ by taking r = 5, 7, 11 and 13 in (1.8) which are analogous to the above theorem. In order to verify some of our congruences, we list following q-series expansions:
and
where O[q]11 contains the terms involving q11 or higher powers of q.
2. New congruences for p[1,r;t](n)
In this section, we prove four new congruence modulo an odd prime ℓ. To prove our congruences, we employ the following q-series identity from [25]:
We also require the following congruence which follows from binomial theorem (or see [26]): For prime ℓ and integer k ≥ 1,
Suppose a and b are relatively prime integers with b ≥ 1 . Let ℓ be an odd prime divisor of a + 3b , and let r be an integer with 0 ≤ r < ℓ. Suppose ℓ and r satisfy any of the following two conditions:
4r + 3 ≡ 0 (mod ℓ), ℓ ≡ 2 or 3 (mod 5) and ℓ ≡ 1 (mod 4),
4r + 3 ≡ 0 (mod ℓ), ℓ ≡ 1 or 4 (mod 5) and ℓ ≡ 3 (mod 4).
Proof. Since ℓ|(a + db), so we can write a + db = ℓm for some integer m. Also, since gcd(a, b) = 1, it follows that gcd(b, ℓ) = 1. Setting t = −a/b in (1.8), we find that
We have
Proof. (i) For ℓ ≡ 3 (mod 5) and ℓ ≡ 1 (mod 4), take ℓ = 13.From [27, p. 176, Theorem 9.2(c)], we note that if p is an odd prime and a is a integer relatively prime to p, then
As Legendre symbol take values 1 and −1 only, (2.16) gives
Similarly, (ii)-(iv) follows from Theorem 2.1 with {a = 2, b = 3, ℓ = 11, r = 2}, { a = 1, b = 4, ℓ = 13, r = 9}, {a = 2, b = 5, ℓ = 17, r = 12} and {a = 7, b = 8, ℓ = 31, r = 7}, respectively. □
The congruence presented in Corollary 2.2(i) can be easily verified from the series expansion of in (1.9).
Suppose a and b are relatively prime integers with b ≥ 1 . Let ℓ be an odd prime divisor of a + 3b and let r be an integer with 0 ≤ r < ℓ. Suppose ℓ and r satisfy any of the following two conditions:
r + 1 ≡ 0 (mod ℓ), ℓ ≡ 3, 5, 6 (mod 7) and ℓ ≡ 1 (mod 4),
r + 1 ≡ 0 (mod ℓ), ℓ ≡ 3, 5, 6 (mod 7) and ℓ ≡ 3 (mod 4).
Proof. Since ℓ|(a + db), so we can write a + db = ℓm for some integer m. Also, since gcd(a, b) = 1, it follows that gcd(b, ℓ) = 1. Setting t = −a/b in (1.8), we find that
We have
Proof. For ℓ ≡ 5 (mod 7) and ℓ ≡ 1 (mod 4), set ℓ = 5. From (2.7), it follows that
Similarly, to prove (ii)–(iv) we set {a = 1, b = 4, ℓ = 13, r = 12}, {a = 2, b = 5, ℓ = 17, r = 16} and {a = 1, b = 6, ℓ = 19, r = 18} in Theorem 2.3, respectively. □
The congruence presented in Corollary 2.4(i) can be easily verified from the series expansion of in (1.10).
Suppose a and b are relatively prime integers with b ≥ 1 . Let ℓ be an odd prime divisor of a + 3b and let r be an integer with 0 ≤ r < ℓ. Suppose ℓ and r satisfy any of the following two conditions:
2r + 3 ≡ 0 (mod ℓ), ℓ ≡ 2, 6, 7, 8, 10 (mod 11) and ℓ ≡ 1 (mod 4),
2r + 3 ≡ 0 (mod ℓ), ℓ ≡ 2, 6, 7, 8, 10 (mod 11) and ℓ ≡ 3 (mod 4).
Proof. Since ℓ|(a + db), so we can write a + db = ℓm for some integer m. Also, since gcd(a, b) = 1, it follows that gcd(b, ℓ) = 1. Setting t = −a/b in (1.8), we find that
We have
Proof. (i) For ℓ ≡ 7 (mod 11) and ℓ ≡ 1 (mod 4), take ℓ = 7. From (2.7), it follows that
Similarly, we set {a = 2, b = 5, ℓ = 17, r = 7}, {a = 5, b = 8, ℓ = 29, r = 13} and {a = 8, b = 11, ℓ = 41, r = 19} in Theorem 2.5 to arrive at (ii)–(iv), respectively. □
The congruence in Corollary 2.6(i) can be easily verified from the series expansion of in (1.11).
Suppose a and b are relatively prime integers with b ≥ 1 . Let ℓ be an odd prime divisor of a + 3b and let r be an integer with 0 ≤ r < ℓ. Suppose ℓ and r satisfy any of the following two conditions:
Proof. Since ℓ|(a + db), so we can write a + db = ℓm for some integer m. Also, since gcd(a, b) = 1, it follows that gcd(b, ℓ) = 1. Setting t = −a/b in (1.8), we find that
We have
Proof. (i) For ℓ ≡ 5 (mod 13) and ℓ ≡ 1 (mod 4), set ℓ = 5. From (2.7), it follows that
(ii) For ℓ ≡ 10 (mod 13) and ℓ ≡ 3 (mod 4), take ℓ = 23. From (2.7), it follows that
Similarly, we set {a = 7, b = 10, ℓ = 37, r = 26} and {a = 8, b = 11, ℓ = 41, r = 29} in Theorem 2.7 to arrive at (iii)–(iv), respectively.□
The congruences presented in Corollary 2.8(i) and (ii) can be verified from the series expansion of and in (1.12) and (1.13), respectively.
The authors would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments which improved the quality of the paper.
