Clairaut anti-invariant submersions from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds

Siddiqi, Mohd Danish; Chaubey, Sudhakar Kumar; Siddiqui, Aliya Naaz

doi:10.1108/AJMS-05-2021-0106

Purpose

The central idea of this research article is to examine the characteristics of Clairaut submersions from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds of type (α, β) and also, to enhance this geometrical analysis with some specific cases, namely Clairaut submersion from Lorentzian α-Sasakian manifold, Lorentzian β-Kenmotsu manifold and Lorentzian cosymplectic manifold. Furthermore, the authors discuss some results about Clairaut Lagrangian submersions whose total space is a Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds of type (α, β). Finally, the authors furnished some examples based on this study.

Design/methodology/approach

This research discourse based on classifications of submersion, mainly Clairaut submersions, whose total manifolds is Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds and its all classes like Lorentzian Sasakian, Lorenztian Kenmotsu and Lorentzian cosymplectic manifolds. In addition, the authors have explored some axioms of Clairaut Lorentzian submersions and illustrates our findings with some non-trivial examples.

Findings

The major finding of this study is to exhibit a necessary and sufficient condition for a submersions to be a Clairaut submersions and also find a condition for Clairaut Lagrangian submersions from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds.

Originality/value

The results and examples of the present manuscript are original. In addition, more general results with fair value and supportive examples are provided.

1. Introduction

The conception of Riemannian immersion is studied extensively together with starting the study of Riemannian geometry. In fact, Riemannian manifolds are studied first as surfaces imbedded in $R^{3}$ ⁠. In 1956, Nash [1] proved that a revolution for Riemannian manifold that all Riemannian manifolds are isometrically embedded at any small part of Euclidean space. Consequently, the differential geometry of the Riemannian immersion is commonly noted, and it can be found in different text books such as ([2, 3]).

Contrastingly, “dual” concept of Riemannian immersions is one of the famous research fields in differential geometry and is the theory of Riemannian submersions, which was first investigated by O’Neill [4] and Gray [5]. Watson [6] popularized the knowledge of Riemannian submersions considering almost Hermitian manifolds in terms of almost Hermitian submersions. Afterward, almost Hermitian submersions are discussed with in various subcategories of almost Hermitian manifolds. Also, Riemannian submersions are enhanced considering many subcategories of almost contact metric manifolds in terms of contact Riemannian submersions. Several materials about Riemannian, almost Hermitian or contact Riemannian submersions are available in reference [2].

Most of the research linked to the theory of anti-invariant Riemannian, Lagrangian submersions and Clairaut anti-invariant submersions is available in Şahin’s book [3]. Afterward, several kinds of Riemannian submersions appeared, for example: semi-invariant, slant, pointwise-slant, semi-slant, hemi-slant and generic submersions. Most of the studies related to these can also be found in Şahin’s book [3].

In 1972, Bishop [7] proposed the concept and conditions of a Clairaut submersion in terms of a natural generalization of a surface of revolution. Under these circumstances, for every geodesic σ at the surface $S$ ⁠, function γSinΘ is constant through σ, here γ is a metric between the point at surface and rotation axis, also Θ defines angle within σ and meridian through σ.

The concept of anti-invariant Riemannian and Clairaut anti-invariant submersion has been fitting a very progressive geometric analysis field since Şahin [8] essentially described such submersions of almost Hermitian manifolds on Riemannian manifolds. Indeed, anti-invariant Riemannian and Clairaut anti-invariant submersion have been examined in various types of geometrical manifolds, namely Kähler [8–10], almost product [11], Sasakian [12, 13], Kenmotsu [13], cosymplectic [30], paracosymplectic [14, 15] and trans-Sasakian manifolds [16–18]. Note that this concept of anti-invariant Riemannian submersion is generalized to conformal anti-invariant submersions [19–21].

In [22], Allison proposed Clairaut submersions in case the total manifold is Lorentzian. In addition, it is discovered that Clairaut submersions are used for static spacetime applications. Basically, a static spacetime can be considered as a Lorentzian manifold.

On the other hand, in 2013, De et al. [23] presented the concept of Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds. Trans-Sasakian structure together with Lorentzian metric can be applied naturally at the odd dimensional manifold. Motivated by above research studies mentioned in this paper, we have examined the Clairaut anti-invariant submersions from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds.

The work is ordered as follows. Section 2 presents basic notion and definition for Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds. Section 3 includes particular background of Riemannian submersions. Section 4 presents definition of anti-invariant and Lagrangian submersions. In section 5, we study anti-invariant submersions and Clairaut anti-invariant submersion from trans-Sasakian manifolds onto Riemannian manifolds admitting horizontal Reeb vector field. In section 6, we deal with some axioms of Clairaut Lagrangian submersion and provide some examples and some of their characteristic properties.

2. Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds

A (2n + 1)-dimensional differentiable manifold M is named the Lorentzian Trans-Sasakian manifold [23] in case it allows (1, 1) tensor field ϕ, the global vector field ζ named Reeb vector field or contra-variant vector field, that is, in case η is a dual 1-form of ζ, and the Lorentzian metric g that satisfies [24].

\begin{matrix} ϕ^{2} U = U + η (U) ζ, η (ζ) = - 1, ϕ ζ = 0, \end{matrix}

(2.1)

g (ϕ U, ϕ V) = g (U, V) + η (U) η (V),

(2.2)

where both U and V refer to any vector fields at M. Also, using previous axioms gives

η ° ϕ = 0 a n d η (U) = g (U, ζ) .

(2.3)

Here, (ϕ, ζ, η, g) [23] is named Lorentzian structure of M. A Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifoldM also satisfies [25].

(D_{U} ϕ) V = α [g (U, V) ζ - η (V) U] + β [g (ϕ U, V) ζ - η (V) ϕ U]

(2.4)

for functions α and β and $D$ is Levi-Civita connection with respect to the Lorentzian metric g at M. Moreover, (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) is named the Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold from type (α, β); for more details, see ([26]). It can be deduced from (2.1) that

\begin{matrix} D_{U} ζ = - α ϕ U - β (U + η (U) ζ) \end{matrix} .

(2.5)

Remark 1.

If α = 0 and β ≠ 0(or β = 1), therefore the manifold turns into the Lorentzian β-Kenmotsu manifold (or Lorentzian Kenmotsu manifold) [23].
If α ≠ 0(or α = 1) and β = 0, therefore this manifold turns into the Lorentzian α-Sasakian manifold (or Lorentzian Sasakian manifold) [23].
In case α = 0 and β, therefore, the manifold turns into the Lorentzian cosymplectic manifold [23].

3. Riemannian submersions

An essential background of Riemannian submersions is given at this part.

Suppose (M, g) and (N, g_N) are Riemannian manifolds, such that dim(M) > dim(N). The subjective mapping ψ: (M, g) → (N, g_N) is named the Riemannian submersion [4] if:

(S1) The rank(ψ) = dim(N).

Therefore, for all q ∈ N, $ψ^{- 1} (q) = ψ_{q}^{- 1}$ is the k-dimensional submanifold of M and is named the fiber, with

k = d i m (M) - d i m (N) .

The vector field at M is named vertical (resp. horizontal) in case it is still as a tangent (orthogonal) relating to the fibers. The vector field X at M is named basic in case X is horizontal and ψ-connecting to the vector field X_* at N, which means ψ_*(X_p) = X_∗ψ(p) for any p ∈ M, where ψ_* is derivative or differential map of ψ. $V$ and $H$ define the projections at vertical distribution kerψ_* and horizontal distribution $k e r ψ_{*}^{⊥}$ ⁠, in the same order. Usually, a manifold (M, g) is named the total manifold and (N, g_N) is named base manifold of the submersion ψ: (M, g) → (N, g_N).

(S2) ψ_* preserves the lengths of horizontal vectors.

This condition is equivalent to say that the derivative map ψ_* of ψ, restricted to $k e r ψ_{*}^{⊥}$ ⁠, is the linear isometry. The geometrical description of Riemannian submersions is represented by O’Neill’s tensors $T$ and $A$ ⁠, determined as:

T_{E_{1}} F_{1} = V D_{V E_{1}} H F_{1} + H D_{V E_{1}} V F_{1},

(3.1)

A_{E_{1}} F_{1} = V D_{H E - 1} H F_{1} + H D_{H E_{1}} V F_{1}

(3.2)

for any vector fields E₁ and F₁ at M, with $D$ is Levi-Civita connection of g. Clearly, $T_{E_{1}}$ in addition to $A_{E_{1}}$ are skew-symmetric operators at tangent bundle of M reversing vertical and the horizontal distributions. To sum up, tensor fields properties $T$ as well as $A$ ⁠, Suppose V₁, W₁ are vertical and X₁, Y₁ are horizontal vector fields at M, therefore

T_{V_{1}} W_{1} = T_{W_{1}} V_{1},

(3.3)

A_{X_{1}} Y_{1} = - A_{Y_{1}} X_{1} = \frac{1}{2} V [X_{1}, Y_{1}] .

(3.4)

On the other hand, from (3.1) and (3.2), we obtain

D_{V_{1}} W_{1} = T_{V_{1}} W_{1} + {\hat{D}}_{V_{1}} W_{1},

(3.5)

D_{V_{1}} X_{1} = T_{V_{1}} X_{1} + H D_{V_{1}} X_{1},

(3.6)

D_{X_{1}} V_{1} = A_{X_{1}} V_{1} + V D_{X_{1}} V_{1},

(3.7)

D_{X_{1}} Y_{1} = H D_{X_{1}} Y_{1} + A_{X_{1}} Y_{1},

(3.8)

where ${\hat{D}}_{V_{1}} W_{1} = V D_{V_{1}} W_{1}$ ⁠. Moreover, if X₁ is basic, then we have $H D_{V_{1}} X_{1} = A_{X_{1}} V_{1}$ ⁠. It appears that $T$ is acting at fibers as second fundamental form, whereas $A$ is acting at horizontal distribution and measuring obstruction to integrability of the distribution. Further details are given in the paper of O’Neill [4] in addition to this book [2].

At the end, the concept of second fundamental form of the map within Riemannian manifolds is recalled. Suppose (M, g) and (N, g_N) are Riemannian manifolds and f: (M, g) → (N, g_N) is the smooth map. Therefore, second fundamental form of f is written as

\begin{matrix} (D f_{*}) (U, V) = D_{U}^{f} f_{*} F - f_{*} (D_{U} V) \end{matrix}

(3.9)

for U, V ∈ Γ(TM), with ∇^f defining the pull-back connection, and $D$ defines the Riemannian connections of the metrics g and g_N. Symmetry is widely known property of second fundamental form, and further, f is named totally geodesic [31] in case $(D f_{*}) (E, F) = 0$ for any U, V ∈ Γ(TM) (as in [19, p. 119]), and f is named the harmonic map [29] in case $t r a c e (D f_{*}) = 0$ (as in [19, p. 73]).

4. Anti-invariant Riemannian submersions

We first recall idea of an anti-invariant Riemannian submersion where its total manifold is the almost contact metric manifold.

Definition 4.1.

([18, 27]) Let M be (2n + 1)-dimensional almost contact metric manifold among almost contact metric constructor (ϕ, ζ, η, g) and N is the Riemannian manifold among Riemannian metric g_N. Considering there is Riemannian submersion ψ: M → N where vertical distribution kerψ_* defines anti-invariant with respect to ϕ, which means, $ϕ k e r ψ_{*} \subseteq k e r ψ_{*}^{⊥}$ ⁠. Therefore, Riemannian submersion π is named the anti-invariant Riemannian submersion. Similar submersions are called the anti-invariant submersions.

Here, horizontal distribution $k e r ψ_{*}^{⊥}$ is given as.

k e r ψ_{*}^{⊥} = ϕ k e r ψ_{*} \oplus μ,

(4.1)

with μ refers to orthogonal complementary distribution of ϕkerψ_* at $k e r ψ_{*}^{⊥}$ , and it is invariant with respect to ϕ.

It is said that the anti-invariant ψ: M → N allows vertical Reeb vector field in case Reeb vector field ξ is tangent to kerψ_* and allows horizontal Reeb vector field in case Reeb vector field ξ is normal to kerψ_*. Clearly, μ includes Reeb vector field ξ if ψ: M → N allows horizontal Reeb vector field ξ.

Now, we begin to study anti-invariant submersions admitting vertical Reeb vector field from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) of type (α, β) using (nontrivial) example.

Example 4.2.

Suppose M is three-dimensional Euclidean space written as

M = {(x, y, z) \in R^{3} ∣ y z \neq 0} .

We consider the Lorentzian trans-Sasakian structure (ϕ, ζ, η, g) atMwith

α = \frac{1}{2} z^{2} \neq 0

and

β = \frac{1}{z} \neq 0

[23] given by the following:

ζ = \frac{\partial}{\partial z}, η = d z, g = (\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & - 1 \end{matrix})

and ϕ is (1, 1) tensor field denoted as ϕ(E₁) = − E₂, ϕ(E₂) = − E₁, ϕ(E₃) = 0.

An orthonormal ϕ-basis of this structure is written as

\{E_{1} = z (\frac{\partial}{\partial x} + y \frac{\partial}{\partial z}), E_{2} = z \frac{\partial}{\partial y}, E_{3} = \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\} .

Here, the map $ψ : (M, ϕ, ξ, η, g) \to (R, g_{1})$ is introduced as:

ψ (x, y, z) = \frac{x + y}{\sqrt{2}},

where g₁ is Lorentzian metric on $R$ ⁠. Therefore, Jacobian matrix of ψ is given as:

[\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} 0]

Since the rank of this matrix equals 1, the map π is the submersion. Using some calculation leads to

\begin{matrix} k e r ψ_{*} = s p a n \{U = - (\frac{E_{1} + E_{2}}{\sqrt{2}}), V = E_{3}\} \end{matrix},

and

\begin{matrix} k e r ψ_{*}^{⊥} = s p a n \{W = \frac{E_{1} + E_{2}}{\sqrt{2}}\} \end{matrix} .

Immediate calculations show that ψ ensures the condition (S2). Thus, ψ is the Riemannian submersion. Moreover, we got ϕ(U) = W. Therefore, ψ is the anti-invariant submersion admitting vertical Reeb vector field.

Remark.

Throughout this research, as a total manifold of an anti-invariant submersion, let us consider a Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) of type (α, β) such that both α ≠ 0 and β ≠ 0.

Notion of Lagrangian submersion is considered the specific case from notion of anti-invariant submersion. We next recall the definition of the Lagrangian submersion from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold onto a Riemannian manifold.

Definition 4.3.

([12]) Let ψ be the anti-invariant Riemannian submersion from the almost contact metric manifold (M, ϕ, ξ, η, g) on the Riemannian manifold (N, g_N). In case μ = {0} or μ = span{ξ}, i.e. $k e r ψ_{*}^{⊥} = ϕ (k e r ψ_{*})$ or $k e r ψ_{*}^{⊥} = ϕ (k e r ψ_{*}) \oplus < ξ >$ , in the same order, therefore ψ is called the Lagrangian submersion.

Let ψ is the anti-invariant submersion from the Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) on the Riemannian manifold (N, g_N). For any $X_{1} \in k e r ψ_{*}^{⊥}$ ⁠, we write

ϕ X_{1} = B X_{1} + C X_{1},

(4.2)

with $B X \in Γ (k e r π_{*})$ and $C X \in Γ (k e r π_{*}^{⊥})$ ⁠.

Definition 4.4.

([7]) Suppose $S$ is the revolution surface at $R^{3}$ with rotation axis $L$ ⁠. For all $q \in S$ , where γ(q) represents the distance between q and $L$ ⁠. Choosing the geodesic $σ : U \subset R \to S$ on $S$ , Suppose Θ(l) is an angle between σ(l) and the meridian curve through σ(l), l ∈ U. By the famous Clairaut’s theorem, we know that for all geodesics σ on $S$ , the product γSinΘ is constant along σ, which means the independence of l.

Using geometrical analysis of Riemannian submersions, Bishop [7] described the idea of Clairaut submersion as follows.

Definition 4.5.

([7]) The Riemannian submersion ψ: M → N is known as the Clairaut submersion in case there is positive function γ at M, that is, for all geodesics σ at M, the function (γ˚σ)SinΘ is constant, where, for all l, Θ(l) is an angle within $\hat{σ} (l)$ and horizontal space σ(l).

Bishop also provided the necessary and sufficient condition for the Riemannian submersion turns into the Clairaut submersion as follows.

Theorem 4.6.

([7]) Let ψ: M → N be the Riemannian submersion with connected fibers. Therefore ψ is the Clairaut submersion with γ = exp(ω) if and only if all fibers are totally umbilical and have the mean curvature vector field $H = - D ω$ , where $D ω$ is gradient of the function ω with respect to g.

5. Anti-invariant submersions admitting horizontal Reeb vector field from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds

The anti-invariant submersions are studied in this part from trans-Sasakian manifolds conceding horizontal Reeb vector field. First, the modern necessary and sufficient condition for similar submersions turns into a Clairaut submersion, and then a few distinctive outcomes for this sort of submersions are shown.

We observe from Definition 4.5, the source of the knowledge of a Clairaut submersion comes from geodesic on its total space. As a result, the necessary and sufficient condition of the curve on total space explored remains geodesic.

Now, the following results are given:

Theorem 5.1.

Let ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is the anti-invaraint Riemannian submersion from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold of type (α, β) onto the Riemannian manifold allowing horizontal Reeb vector field. In case $σ : U \subset R \to M$ is regular curve and V₁(l) in addition to Z₁(l) defines vertical and horizontal components of the tangent vector field $\hat{σ} (l) = G$ of σ(l), in the same order, therefore σ is geodesic if and only if through σ the following equation

V D_{\hat{σ}} B Z_{1} + A_{Z_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + T_{V_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) C Z_{1} + α η (Z_{1}) V_{1} + β η (Z_{1}) B Z_{1} = 0

(5.1)

H D_{\hat{σ}} C Z_{1} + H D_{\hat{σ}} ϕ V_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) B Z_{1} + α [η (Z_{1}) Z_{1} + v ζ]

(5.2)

+ β [η (Z_{1}) ϕ (V_{1}) + η (Z_{1}) C Z_{1}] = 0 .

hold, where $\sqrt{s}$ is constant speed ofσ.

Proof.In view of Eqn (2.4), we find

(D_{\hat{σ}} ϕ) \hat{σ} = ϕ D_{\hat{σ}} \hat{σ} + α [g (\hat{σ}, \hat{σ}) ζ - η (\hat{σ}) \hat{σ}] + β [g (ϕ \hat{σ}, \hat{σ}) ζ - η (\hat{σ}) ϕ \hat{σ}]

(5.3)

Since $\hat{σ} = V_{1} + Z_{1}$ ⁠, $g (\hat{σ}, \hat{σ}) = s$ ⁠, and η(V₁) = 0, we can note

D_{V_{1} + Z_{1}} ϕ (V_{1} + Z_{1}) = ϕ D_{\hat{σ}} \hat{σ} + α [v ζ - η (V_{1}) \hat{σ} - η (Z_{1}) \hat{σ}] - β [η (Z_{1}) (ϕ V_{1} + ϕ Z_{1})] .

(5.4)

Now, from a straight forward calculation, we find

D_{V_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + D_{V_{1}} ϕ Z_{1} + D_{Z_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + D_{Z_{1}} ϕ Z_{1} = ϕ D_{\hat{σ}} \hat{σ} + α [v ζ - η (Z_{1}) V_{1} - η (Z_{1}) Z_{1}]

(5.5)

- β [η (Z_{1}) (ϕ V_{1} + ϕ Z_{1})] .

In fact η (V₁) = 0. By using Eqns (3.3), (3.4), (3.5) and (3.6), we find

H (D_{\hat{σ}} ϕ V_{1} + D_{\hat{σ}} C Z_{1}) + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) (B Z_{1} + C_{Z_{1}}) + V D_{\hat{σ}} B Z_{1} + A_{Z_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + T_{V_{1}} ϕ V_{1}

(5.6)

= ϕ D_{\hat{σ}} \hat{σ} + α [v ζ - η (Z_{1}) V_{1} - η (Z_{1}) Z_{1}] - β [η (Z_{1}) (B Z_{1} + C Z_{1} + ϕ V_{1}] .

Now capturing the vertical and horizontal components from Eqn (5.6), we find the following equations:

V D_{\hat{σ}} B Z_{1} + A_{Z_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + T_{V_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) C Z_{1} = V ϕ D_{\hat{σ}} \hat{σ} - α η (Z_{1}) V_{1} - β η (Z_{1}) B Z_{1}

(5.7)

and

H D_{\hat{σ}} C Z_{1} + H D_{\hat{σ}} ϕ V_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) B Z_{1}

(5.8)

= H ϕ D_{\hat{σ}} \hat{σ} - α v ζ - α η (Z_{1}) Z_{1} - β η (Z_{1}) ϕ V_{1} - β η (Z_{1}) C Z_{1} .

From equations (5.7) and (5.8), it is simply observed that σ is geodesic if and only if (5.1) and (5.2) hold. □

Using Theorem (5.1) in addition to Remark (1), the following corollaries are obtained.

Corollary 5.2.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is the anti-invaraint Riemannian submersion from Lorentzian α-Sasakian manifold of type (α, 0) onto the Riemannian manifold allowing horizontal Reeb vector field. In case $σ : U \subset R \to M$ is regular curve and V₁(l) in addition to Z₁(l) defines vertical and horizontal components of tangent vector field $\hat{σ} (l) = G$ of σ(l), in the same order, therefore σ is geodesic if and only if through σ the following equations

V D_{\hat{σ}} B Z_{1} + A_{Z_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + T_{V_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) C Z_{1} + α η (Z_{1}) V_{1} = 0

(5.9)

H D_{\hat{σ}} C Z_{1} + H D_{\hat{σ}} ϕ V_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) B Z_{1} + α [η (Z_{1}) Z_{1} + v ζ] = 0 .

(5.10)

maintain, where

\sqrt{s}

is constant speed ofσ.

Corollary 5.3.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is the anti-invariant Riemannian submersion from Lorentzian β-Kenmotsu manifold of type (0, β) onto the Riemannian manifold admitting horizontal Reeb vector field. In case $σ : U \subset R \to M$ is the regular curve and V₁(l) in addition to Z₁(l) defines vertical and horizontal components of tangent vector field $\hat{σ} (l) = G$ of σ(l), in the same order, therefore σ is geodesic if and only if through σ the following equation

V D_{\hat{σ}} B Z_{1} + A_{Z_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + T_{V_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) C Z_{1} + β η (Z_{1}) B Z_{1} = 0

(5.11)

H D_{\hat{σ}} C Z_{1} + H D_{\hat{σ}} ϕ V_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) B Z_{1} + β [η (Z_{1}) ϕ (V_{1}) + η (Z_{1}) C Z_{1}] = 0 .

(5.12)

hold, where

\sqrt{s}

is constant speed ofσ.

Corollary 5.4.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is an anti-invaraint Riemannian submersion from Lorentzian cosymplectic manifold of type (0, 0) onto the Riemannian manifold allowing horizontal Reeb vector field. If $σ : U \subset R \to M$ is the regular curve and V₁(l) in addition to Z₁(l) defines vertical and horizontal components of the tangent vector field $\hat{σ} (l) = G$ of σ(l), in the same order, therefore σ is geodesic if and only if through σ the following equation

V D_{\hat{σ}} B Z_{1} + A_{Z_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + T_{V_{1}} ϕ V_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) C Z_{1} = 0

(5.13)

H D_{\hat{σ}} C Z_{1} + H D_{\hat{σ}} ϕ V_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) B Z_{1} = 0 .

(5.14)

hold, where

\sqrt{s}

is constant speed ofσ.

Theorem 5.5.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is the anti-invariant Riemannian submersion from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold of type (α, β) onto the Riemannian manifold allowing horizontal Reeb vector field. Therefore ψ is Clairaut submersion with γ = exp(ω) if and only if through σ

[g (D ω, Z_{1}) - β η (Z_{1})] {|V_{1}|}^{2} = g (α η (Z_{1}) Z_{1} + H D_{\hat{σ}} C Z_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) B Z_{1}, ϕ V_{1})

(5.15)

holds, whereV₁(l) andZ₁(l) are vertical and horizontal components of the tangent vector field

\hat{σ} (l)

of the geodesicσ(l) atM, in the same order.

Proof. Consider σ(l) as the geodesic having the speed $\sqrt{s}$ at M, therefore,

s = {|\hat{σ} (l)|}^{2} .

(5.16)

Now, from Eqn (5.16), we achieve that

g (V_{1} (l), V_{1} (l)) = v S i n^{2} Θ (l) a n d g (Z_{1} (l), Z_{1} (l)) = v C o s^{2} Θ (l),

(5.17)

where Θ(l) is the angle within $\hat{σ} (l)$ and horizontal space at σ(l). Now, by the derivative of first part of Eqn (5.17), we find

\frac{d}{d l} g (V_{1} (l), V_{1} (l)) = 2 g (D_{\hat{σ} (l)} V_{1} (l), V_{1} (l)) = 2 v S i n Θ C o s Θ \frac{d Θ}{d l} (l),

(5.18)

Using the Lorentzian trans-Sasakian structure, we find

g (ϕ D_{\hat{σ} (l)} V_{1} (l), ϕ V_{1} (l)) = v S i n Θ C o s Θ \frac{d Θ}{d l} (l),

(5.19)

Once again, from Eqn (2.4), we have

ϕ D_{\hat{σ}} V_{1} = D_{\hat{σ}} ϕ V_{1} - α g (\hat{α}, V_{1}) ζ - β g (ϕ \hat{σ}, V_{1}) ζ .

(5.20)

Hence,

g (ϕ D_{\hat{σ}} V_{1}, ϕ V_{1}) = g (H ϕ D_{\hat{σ}} V_{1}, ϕ V_{1}),

(5.21)

since η(V) = 0, g(ϕV₁, ζ) = 0 and using the fact that ϕV₁ is horizontal.

Thus, from Eqn (5.19), we obtain

g (H ϕ D_{\hat{σ}} V_{1}, ϕ V_{1}) = v S i n Θ C o s Θ \frac{d Θ}{d l} (l) .

(5.22)

From Eqn (5.2), we find along σ,

- g (H D_{\hat{σ}} C Z_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) B Z_{1} + α η (Z_{1}) Z_{1} + β η (Z_{1}) ϕ (V_{1}), ϕ V_{1}) = v S i n Θ C o s Θ \frac{d Θ}{d l},

(5.23)

since g(ϕV₁, ζ) = 0.

On contrary, ψ is Clairaut submersion with γ = exp(ω) if and only if

\frac{d}{d l} [e x p (ω) S i n Θ] = 0 \leftrightarrow e x p (ω) [\frac{d ω}{d l} S i n Θ + C o s Θ \frac{d Θ}{d l}] = 0 .

(5.24)

Now, taking the product of Eqn (5.24) with nonzero factor vSinΘ, we find

\frac{d ω}{d l} v S i n^{2} Θ + v S i n Θ C o s Θ \frac{d Θ}{d l} = 0 .

(5.25)

Using equations (5.23) and (5.24), we obtain

\frac{d ω}{d l} [σ (l)] {|V_{1}|}^{2} = g (α η (Z_{1}) Z_{1} + H D_{\hat{σ}} C Z_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) B Z_{1}, ϕ V_{1}) + β η (Z_{1}) {|V_{1}|}^{2} .

(5.26)

In fact $\frac{d ω}{d l} [σ (l)] = \hat{σ} [ω] = g (D ω, \hat{σ}) = g (D ω, Z_{1})$ ⁠, the expression (5.29) follows from (5.26). □

Now, the following corollaries are given:

Corollary 5.6.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is the anti-invariant Riemannian submersion from Lorentzian α-Sasakian manifold of type (α, 0) onto the Riemannian manifold allowing horizontal Reeb vector field. Therefore ψ is Clairaut submersion with γ = exp(ω) if and only if through σ

[g (D ω, Z_{1})] {|V_{1}|}^{2} = g (α η (Z_{1}) Z_{1} + H D_{\hat{σ}} C Z_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) B Z_{1}, ϕ V_{1})

(5.27)

holds, whereV₁(l) andZ₁(l) are vertical and horizontal components of the tangent vector field

\hat{σ} (l)

of the geodesicσ(l) atM, in the same order.

Corollary 5.7.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is the anti-invariant Riemannian submersion from Lorentzian β-Kenmotsu manifold of type (0, β) onto the Riemannian manifold allowing horizontal Reeb vector field. Therefore ψ is Clairaut submersion with γ = exp(ω) if and only if through σ

[g (D ω, Z_{1}) - β η (Z_{1})] {|V_{1}|}^{2} = g (H D_{\hat{σ}} C Z_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) B Z_{1}, ϕ V_{1})

(5.28)

holds, whereV₁(l) andZ₁(l) are vertical and horizontal components of tangent vector field

\hat{σ} (l)

of the geodesicσ(l) atM, in the same order.

Corollary 5.8.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is the anti-invariant Riemannian submersion from Lorentzian cosymplectic manifold of type (α, β) onto the Riemannian manifold admitting horizontal Reeb vector field. Therefore ψ is Clairaut submersion with γ = exp(ω) if and only if along σ

g (D ω, Z_{1}) {|V_{1}|}^{2} = g (H D_{\hat{σ}} C Z_{1} + (T_{V_{1}} + A_{Z_{1}}) B Z_{1}, ϕ V_{1})

(5.29)

holds, whereV₁(l) andZ₁(l) are vertical and horizontal components of the tangent vector field

\hat{σ} (l)

of the geodesicσ(l) atM, in the same order.

Now, from Eqn (5.29), we also obtain the following conclusion.

Corollary 5.9.

Suppose ψ is the Clairaut anti-invariant submersion from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) of type (α, β) on the Riemannian manifold (N, g_N). Therefore,

g (D ω, ζ) = β .

(5.30)

Proof. Since ζ is a horizontal Reeb vector field. Setting Z₁ = ζ and using the fact $\frac{d ω}{d l} [σ (l)] = \hat{σ} [ω] = g (D ω, \hat{σ}) = g (D ω, Z_{1})$ ⁠, the expression (5.26) gives (5.30). □

Corollary 5.10.

Suppose ψ is the Clairaut anti-invariant submersion from Lorentzian α-Sasakian (or Lorentzian Sasakian) manifold (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) of type (α, 0) onto the Riemannian manifold (N, g_N). Therefore,

g (D ω, ζ) = 0 .

(5.31)

Proof. Since for Lorentzian α-Sasakian (or Lorentzian Sasakian) β = 0, and using similar fact as we have used in proof of Corollary 5.9 together, we find the desired result. □

Theorem 5.11.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is a Clairaut anti-invariant submersion from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold of type (α, β) onto a Riemannian manifold admitting horizontal Reeb vector field with γ = exp(ω). Then we have

A_{ϕ V_{1}} ϕ G_{1} = G_{1} (ω) V_{1}

(5.32)

forG₁ ∈ Γ(μ) andV₁ ∈ (kerψ_*) such thatϕV₁is basic vector.

Proof. Suppose ψ is the Clairaut anti-invariant submersion allowing horizontal Reeb vector field from a Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold onto a Riemannian manifold with γ = exp(ω). Now, by consequences of Theorem (4.6), we find

T_{U_{1}} G_{1} = - g (U_{1}, G_{1}) D ω

(5.33)

for U₁, G₁ ∈ (kerψ_*). If we spread with ϕV₁, V₁ ∈ (kerψ_*) such that ϕV₁ is basic and using , we find

g (D_{U_{1}} G_{1}, ϕ V_{1}) = - g (U_{1}, G_{1}) g (D ω, ϕ V_{1}) .

(5.34)

g (D_{U_{1}} ϕ V_{1}, G_{1}) = g (U_{1}, G_{1}) g (D ω, ϕ V_{1}) .

(5.35)

In fact g(G₁, ϕV₁) = 0. Through Eqn (2.4), we infer

g (ϕ D_{U_{1}} V_{1}, G_{1}) = - g (U_{1}, G_{1}) g (D ω, ϕ V_{1}) .

(5.36)

Adopting the Lorentzian trans-Sasakian structure, we notice

- g (D_{U_{1}} V_{1}, ϕ G_{1}) = g (U_{1}, G_{1}) g (D ω, ϕ V_{1}) .

(5.37)

Once again, adopting (3.3), we turn up

- g (T_{U_{1}} V_{1}, ϕ G_{1}) = g (U_{1}, G_{1}) g (D ω, ϕ V_{1}) .

(5.38)

Henceforth, through Eqn (5.33), we attain

g (U_{1}, V_{1}) g (D ω, ϕ G_{1}) = g (U_{1}, G_{1}) g (D ω, ϕ V_{1}) .

(5.39)

Putting U₁ = V₁ and shifting U₁ with by G₁ in Eqn (5.39), we acquire

{|G_{1}|}^{2} g (D ω, ϕ G_{1}) = g (U_{1}, G_{1}) g (D ω, ϕ V_{1}) .

(5.40)

Adopting Eqn (5.39) with setting V₁ = U₁, we have

g (D ω, ϕ G_{1}) = \frac{g^{2} (U_{1}, G_{1})}{{|U_{1}|}^{2} {|G_{1}|}^{2}} g (D ω, ϕ V_{1}) .

(5.41)

On the contrary, involving Eqn (2.4), we turn up

g (D_{G_{1}} ϕ V_{1}, ϕ W_{1}) = g (ϕ D_{G_{1}}, ϕ W_{1}) .

(5.42)

for W₁ ∈ Γ(μ) and W₁ ≠ ζ. Using Eqn (2.5), we get

g (D_{G_{1}} ϕ V_{1}, ϕ W_{1}) = g (D_{G_{1}}, W_{1}) .

(5.43)

Adopting equations (3.3) and (5.33), we get

g (D_{G_{1}} ϕ V_{1}, ϕ W_{1}) = g (V_{1}, ϕ G_{1}) g (D ω, W_{1}) .

(5.44)

After all ϕV₁ is basic vector and using the case that $H D_{G_{1}} ϕ V_{1} = A_{ϕ V_{1}} G_{1}$ ⁠, we turn up

g (D_{G_{1}} ϕ V_{1}, ϕ W_{1}) = g (A_{ϕ G_{1}} V_{1}, ϕ W_{1}) .

(5.45)

Involving again, Eqns (5.44), (5.45) and the skew-symmetric nature of A, we turn up

g (D ω, W_{1}) g (V_{1}, ϕ G_{1}) = g (A_{ϕ G_{1}} V_{1}, ϕ W_{1}) .

(5.46)

By reason of $A_{ϕ V_{1}} ϕ W_{1}$ ⁠, G₁ and V₁ are vertical and ω is horizontal, we turn up expression (5.32).

Particularly if $D ω \in ϕ (k e r ψ_{*})$ ⁠, then from (5.41) in proof of Theorem 5.11 and the equality case of Schwarz inequality, we have have that□

Corollary 5.12.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is the Clairaut Lagrangian submersion allowing horizontal Reeb vector field from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold of type (α, β) onto a Riemannian manifold with γ = exp(ω). If $D ω \in ϕ (k e r ψ_{*})$ , then either ω is constant on ϕ(kerψ_*) or fiber of ψ is one-dimensional.

6. Clairaut Lagrangian submersions

This section deals with some results of Clairaut Lagrangian submersions conceding with horizontal Reeb vector field. Moreover, when the function ω is constant, $D ω = 0$ ⁠. Thus by Theorem 4.6 and Corollary 5.12, we have the following results.

Corollary 6.1.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is a Clairaut anti-invariant submersion allowing horizontal Reeb vector field from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold of type (α, β) on the Riemannian manifold with γ = exp(ω) and dim(kerψ_*) > 1, then fibers of ψ are totally geodesic if and only if

A_{ϕ V_{1}} ϕ Z_{1} = 0

forV₁ ∈ (kerψ_*),ϕV₁is basic andZ₁ ∈ μ.

Moreover, in case the submersion ψ at Theorem (5.11) is Lagrangian submersion, therefore $A_{ϕ V_{1}} ϕ Z_{1}$ is always vanish, because $μ = \{0\}$ or $μ = s p a n \{ζ\}$ ⁠. Also from Corollaries 5.9 and 5.10, we have $D ω \in ϕ (k e r ψ_{*})$ ⁠. Hence, the following consequences of Theorem (5.11) and Corollary 5.12 are given.

Theorem 6.2.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is the Clairaut Lagrangian submersion allowing horizontal Reeb vector field from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold of type (α, β) onto a Riemannian manifold with γ = exp(ω). Therefore, fibers of ψ can be one-dimensional or totally geodesic.

Corollary 6.3.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is the Clairaut Lagrangian submersion admitting horizontal Reeb vector field from Lorentzian α-Sasakian manifold of type (α, 0) onto a Riemannian manifold with γ = exp(ω). Therefore fibers of ψ can be one-dimensional or totally geodesic.

Corollary 6.4.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is the Clairaut Lagrangian submersion allowing horizontal Reeb vector field from Lorentzian β-Kenmotsu manifold of type (0, β) onto a Riemannian manifold with γ = exp(ω). Therefore fibers of ψ can be one-dimensional or totally geodesic.

Corollary 6.5.

Suppose ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) → (N, g_N) is the Clairaut Lagrangian submersion allowing horizontal Reeb vector field from Lorentzian cosymplectic manifold of type (α, β) onto a Riemannian manifold with γ = exp(ω). Therefore either fibers of ψ can be one-dimensional or totally geodesic.

7. Applications

The following result is Theorem 2 stated by Gauchman in [28].

Theorem 7.1.

Suppose ψ; (M, g) → (N, g_N) is the Clairaut submersion with γ, where M is complete, connected and simply connected, and N is simply connected. Assume that any vertical leaf of ψ has no nontrivial Killing vector field. Suppose p is the point of M. Therefore M is isometric to the warped product N ×_fB, where B is the vertical leaf through p and $f : N \to R$ is determined using this equation γ = f˚ψ.

In [23] De and Srakar prove that trans-Sasakian structures are complete and connected. Indeed, Riemannian manifold also preserved the characteristic of simple connectedness. Therefore, the following results are obtained.

Theorem 7.2.

ψ: (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g, α, β) → (N, g_N) is a Clairaut Lagrangian submersion with γ, where (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g) is complete, connected, and simply connected Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold, and Riemannian manifold (N, g_N) is simply connected. Assume that any vertical leaf of ψ has no nontrivial Killing vector field. Let p be a point of (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g). Then Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifold of (α, β) type is isometric to a warped product N ×_fB, where B is the vertical leaf through p and $f : N \to R$ is defined by the equation γ = f˚ψ.

Remark.

For particular values of α and β easily we can turn up the similar results like Theorem (7.2) for α-Lorentzian Sasakian manifold (Lorentzian Sasakian manifold), β-Lorentzian Kenmotsu manifold (Lorentzian Kenmotsu manifold), and Lorentzian cosymplectic manifold.

Now, we describe some examples of Clairaut submersion from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds (M, ϕ, ξ, η, g) of type (α, β).

Example 7.3.

Suppose M is three-dimensional Euclidean space written as

M = {(x, y, z) \in R^{3} ∣ y z \neq 0} .

We consider the Lorentzian trans-Sasakian structure (ϕ, ξ, η, g, α, β) at M with α = 0 and β = 1 [23] given by the following:

ζ = \frac{\partial}{\partial z}, η = d z, g = (\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & - 1 \end{matrix})

and ϕ is the (1, 1) tensor field determined as

ϕ(E₁) = − E₂, ϕ(E₂) = − E₁, ϕ(E₃) = 0. An orthonormal ϕ-basis of this constructor is written

as

\{E_{1} = z \frac{\partial}{\partial x}, E_{2} = z \frac{\partial}{\partial y}, E_{3} = z \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\} .

Here, the map $ψ : (M, ϕ, ξ, η, g, α, β) \to (R, g_{1})$ is written as:

ψ (x, y, z) = (\frac{x + y}{\sqrt{2}}, z),

where g₁ is the usual metric at $R$ ⁠. Now, by a straightforward computation, we turn up

\begin{matrix} k e r ψ_{*} = s p a n \{U = - (\frac{E_{1} + E_{2}}{\sqrt{2}})\} \end{matrix},

and

\begin{matrix} k e r ψ_{*}^{⊥} = s p a n \{V = \frac{E_{1} + E_{2}}{\sqrt{2}}, W = E_{3}\} \end{matrix} .

Easily, we observe that ψ is the Riemannian submersion. Moreover, we have ϕ(U) = V. Therefore, ψ is the anti-invariant submersion allowing horizontal Reeb vector field. Particularly, ψ is Lagrangian submersion. Furthermore, after all the fibers of ψ are one-dimensional, then they are simply totally umbilical. At this point, it is proved that fibers are not considered totally geodesic, and it is found that the function of $R^{3}$ obeying $T_{U_{1}} U_{1} = - D ω$ ⁠. Therefore, after some sort of calculation, we turn up

D_{U_{1}} U_{1} = \frac{1}{2} (D_{E_{1}} E_{1} - D_{E_{1}} E_{2} - D_{E_{2}} E_{1} - D_{E_{2}} E_{2}) .

(7.1)

Adopting the Lorentzian trans-Sasakian structure results in

D_{E_{1}} E_{1} = D_{E_{2}} E_{2} = - E_{3} a n d D_{E_{1}} E_{2} = - D_{E_{2}} E_{1} = 0

D_{U_{1}} U_{1} = - z \frac{\partial}{\partial z}

Using (3.5), we turn up

T_{U_{1}} U_{1} = - z \frac{\partial}{\partial z} .

For any function ω of $(R^{3}, ϕ, ζ, η, g)$ ⁠, the gradient of ω with respect to the metric g is

D ω = \sum_{i, j}^{3} \frac{\partial ω}{\partial x_{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{j}} = [\frac{\partial ω}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial ω}{\partial y} \frac{\partial}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial ω}{\partial z} \frac{\partial}{\partial z}] .

Here, at this point, it is clear to observe that $ω = - \frac{z^{2}}{2}$ for the function of z and $T_{U_{1}} U_{1} = - D ω = - ζ$ ⁠. Also for any U₂ ∈ (kerψ_*), we have

T_{U_{2}} U_{2} = - {|U_{2}|}^{2} D ω .

Henceforth, using Theorem (5.26), the submersion ψ is Clairaut submersion.

Example 7.4.

Suppose M is three-dimensional Euclidean space written as

M = {(x, y, z) \in R^{3} ∣ y z \neq 0} .

We consider the Lorentzian trans-Sasakian structure (ϕ, ξ, η, g, α, β) at M with α = − 1 and β = 0 given by the following:

ζ = \frac{\partial}{\partial z}, η = d z, g = (\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & - 1 \end{matrix})

and ϕ is (1, 1) tensor field determined as

ϕ(E₁) = − E₁, ϕ(E₂) = − E₂, ϕ(E₃) = 0. An orthonormal ϕ-basis is written as

\{E_{1} = e^{x + z} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}, E_{2} = e^{y + z} \frac{\partial}{\partial y}, E_{3} = \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\} .

Moreover, we have

D_{E_{i}} E_{3} = - E_{i}, \forall i = 1,2, D_{E_{i}} E_{i} = - 2 E_{3}, \forall i = 1,2 D_{E_{i}} E_{j} = 0, i \neq j a n d i = j = 3 .

Here, the map $ψ : (M, ϕ, ζ, η, g, α, β) \to (R, g_{1})$ is defined by the following:

ψ (x, y, z) = (\frac{x + y}{\sqrt{2}}, z),

where g₁ is usual metric at

R

⁠. Now, by a straightforward computation, we turn up

\begin{matrix} k e r ψ_{*} = s p a n \{U = - (\frac{E_{1} + E_{2}}{\sqrt{2}})\} \end{matrix},

and

\begin{matrix} k e r ψ_{*}^{⊥} = s p a n \{V = \frac{E_{1} + E_{2}}{\sqrt{2}}, W = E_{3}\} \end{matrix} .

Easily, we observe that ψ is the Riemannian submersion. Moreover, we have ϕ(U) = V. Therefore, ψ is the anti-invariant submersion admitting horizontal Reeb vector field. Particularly, ψ is Lagrangian submersion. Furthermore, after all the fibers of ψ are one-dimensional, then they are simply totally umbilical. At this point, it is proved that fibers are not totally geodesic, and it is found that the function of $R^{3}$ obeying $T_{U_{1}} U_{1} = - D ω$ ⁠. Therefore, after some sort of calculation, we turn up

D_{U_{1}} U_{1} = \frac{1}{2} (D_{E_{1}} E_{1} - D_{E_{1}} E_{2} - D_{E_{2}} E_{1} - D_{E_{2}} E_{2}) .

(7.2)

Adopting the Lorentzian trans-Sasakian structure, we observe that

D_{U_{1}} U_{1} = 2 \frac{\partial}{\partial z}

Using (3.5), we turn up

T_{U_{1}} U_{1} = 2 \frac{\partial}{\partial z} .

For all functions ω at

(R^{3}, ϕ, ξ, η, g)

⁠, the gradient of ω with respect to the metric gis

D ω = \sum_{i, j}^{3} \frac{\partial ω}{\partial x_{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{j}} = [\frac{\partial ω}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial ω}{\partial y} \frac{\partial}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial ω}{\partial z} \frac{\partial}{\partial z}] .

Now, at this point, it is clear to observe that ω = − 2z for the function of z and

T_{U_{1}} U_{1} = - D ω = - 2 ξ

⁠. Also for any U₂ ∈ (kerψ_*), we have

T_{U_{2}} U_{2} = - {|U_{2}|}^{2} D ω .

Henceforth, by Theorem (5.26), the submersion ψ is Clairaut submersion.

The authors are grateful to the referee for the valuable suggestions and comments toward the improvement of the paper.

References

1.

Nash

JN

.

The imbedding problem for Riemannian manifolds

.

Ann Math

.

1956

;

63

(

2

):

20

-

63

.

Google Scholar

2.

Falcitelli

M

,

Ianus

S

,

Pastore

AM

Riemannian submersions and related topics

,

River Edge, New Jerssey, NJ

:

World Scientific

,

2004

.

Google Scholar

3.

Ṣahin

B

.

Riemannian Submersions, Riemannian Maps in Hermitian Geometry, and their Applications

.

Elsiever

,

2017

.

Google Scholar

4.

O'Neill

B

.

The fundamental equations of a submersion

.

Mich Math J

.

1966

;

13

:

458

-

69

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

5.

Gray

A

.

Pseudo-Riemannian almost product manifolds and submersion

.

J Math Mech

.

1967

;

16

:

715

-

37

.

Google Scholar

6.

Watson

B

.

Almost Hermitian submersions

.

J Differ Geom

.

1976

;

11

(

1

):

147

-

65

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

7.

Bishop

RL

,

Clairaut submersions

,

Differential Geometry

,

Tokyo

:

Kinokuniya

.

1972

:

1689

-

703

,

21-31

.

Google Scholar

8.

Ṣahin

B

.

Anti-invariant Riemannian submersions from almost Hermitian manifolds

.

Cent Eur J Math

.

2010

;

8

(

3

):

437

-

47

.

Google Scholar

9.

Lee

J

,

Park

JH

,

Ṣahin

B

and

Song

DY

.

Einstein conditions for the base of anti-invariant Riemannian submerion and Clairaut submersion

.

Taiwanese J Math

;

19

(

4

).

2015

:

1145

-

60

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

10.

Taştan

HM

.

On Lagrangian submersions

.

Hacettepe J Math Stat

.

2014

;

43

(

6

):

993

-

1000

.

Google Scholar

11.

Gündüzalp

Y

.

Clairaut anti-invaraiant submersions from almost product Riemannnian manifolds

.

Beitr Algebra Geom

.

2020

;

61

:

605

-

14

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

12.

Taştan

HM

.

Lagrangian submersions from normal almost contact manifolds

.

Filomat

.

2017

;

31

(

12

):

3885

-

95

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

13.

Taştan

HM

,

Gerdan

S

.

Clairaut anti-invariant submersions from Sasakian and Kenmotsu manifolds

.

Mediterr J Math

.

2017

;

14

:

235

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

14.

Gündüzalp

Y

.

Anti-invariant Pseudo-Riemannian submersions and Clairaut anti-invaraiant submersions from Paracosymplectic manifolds

.

Mediterr J Math

.

2019

;

16

:

94

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

15.

Siddiqi

MD

,

Akyol

MA

.

Anti-invariant ξ^⊥-Riemannian submersions from hyperbolic β-Kenmotsu manifolds

.

Cubo (Temuco)

.

2018

;

20

(

1

):

79

-

94

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

16.

Siddiqi

MD

,

Akyol

MA

.

Anti-invariant ξ^⊥-Riemannian submersions from almost hyperbolic contact manifolds

.

Int Elec J Geom

.

2019

;

12

(

1

):

32

-

42

.

Google Scholar

17.

Siddiqi

MD

.

Submersions of contact CR-submanifolds of generalized quasi-Sasakian manifolds

.

J Dynamical Syst Geometric theories

.

2020

;

18

(

1

):

81

-

95

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

18.

Taştan

HM

,

Siddiqi

MD

.

Anti-invariant and Lagrangian submersions from trans-Sasakian manifolds

.

Balkan J Geom App

.

2020

;

25

(

2

) :

106

-

23

.

Google Scholar

19.

Akyol

MA

,

Ṣahin

B

.

Conformal anti-invariant submersions from almost Hermitian manifolds

.

Turk J Math Stat

.

2016

;

40

(

1

),

43

-

70

.

Google Scholar

20.

Akyol

MA

,

Sari

R

,

Aksoy

,

E

.

Semi-invariant ξ^⊥-Riemannian submersion from almost contact metric manifolds

.

Int J Geom Meth Mode Phys

.

2017

;

14

(

5

), 1750074.

Google Scholar

21.

Akyol

MA

.

Conformal anti-invariant submersions from cosymplectic manifolds

.

Hacettepe J Math Stat

.

2017

;

46

(

2

):

177

-

92

.

Google Scholar

22.

Allison

D

.

Lorentzian Clairaut submersions

.

Geom Dedicata

.

1996

;

63

(

3

):

309

-

19

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

23.

De

UC

and

De

K

.

On Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds

.

Commun Fac Sci Univ Ank Ser A1

.

2013

;

62

(

2

):

1303

-

5991

.

Google Scholar

24.

Blair

DE

Contact manifolds in Riemannian geometry

,

Lecture Notes in math

,

Berlin-New York, NY

:

Springer Verlag

.

1976

:

509

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

25.

Oubina

JA

.

New classes of almost contact metric structures

.

Pub. Math. Debrecen

.

1980

;

32

:

187

-

93

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

26.

Blair

DE

,

Oubina

JA

.

Conformal and related changes of metric on the product of two almost contact metric manifolds

.

Publications Matematiques Debrecen

.

1990

;

34

:

199

-

207

.

Google Scholar

Crossref

27.

Yano

K

and

Kon

M

Structures on manifolds

,

Singapore

:

World Scientific

,

1984

.

Google Scholar

28.

Gauchman

H

.

On a decomposition of Riemannian manifolds

,

Houston J Math

.

1981

;

7

(

3

):

365

-

372

.

Google Scholar

Clairaut anti-invariant submersions from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds

1. Introduction

2. Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds

3. Riemannian submersions

4. Anti-invariant Riemannian submersions

5. Anti-invariant submersions admitting horizontal Reeb vector field from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds

6. Clairaut Lagrangian submersions

7. Applications

References

Further reading

Email Alerts

Cited By

Clairaut anti-invariant submersions from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds Open Access

1. Introduction

2. Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds

3. Riemannian submersions

4. Anti-invariant Riemannian submersions

5. Anti-invariant submersions admitting horizontal Reeb vector field from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds

6. Clairaut Lagrangian submersions

7. Applications

References

Further reading

Email Alerts

Recommended for you

Cited By

Sharing Unavailable

Clairaut anti-invariant submersions from Lorentzian trans-Sasakian manifolds