Skip to Main Content
Purpose

In this paper, the authors prove that the Douglas space of second kind with a generalised form of special (α, β)-metric F, is conformally invariant.

Design/methodology/approach

For, the authors have used the notion of conformal transformation and Douglas space.

Findings

The authors found some results to show that the Douglas space of second kind with certain (α, β)-metrics such as Randers metric, first approximate Matsumoto metric along with some special (α, β)-metrics, is invariant under a conformal change.

Originality/value

The authors introduced Douglas space of second kind and established conditions under which it can be transformed to a Douglas space of second kind.

A number of geometers have been studying Douglas space [1, 2] from different point of view. The theory of Finsler spaces more precisely Berwald spaces with an (α, β)-metric [3–5] have significant role to develop the Finsler geometry [6]. The concept of Douglas space of second kind with (α, β)-metric was first discussed by I. Y. Lee [7] in Finsler geometry. In [8], S. Bacso and Matsumoto developed the concept of Douglas space as an extension of Berwald space. In [9], S. Bacso and Szilagyi introduced the concept of weakly-Berwald space as another extension of Berwald space. In [10], M. S. Kneblman started working on the concept of conformal Finsler spaces and consequently, this notion was explored by M. Hashiguchi [11]. In [12, 13] Y. D. Lee and B.N. Prasad developed the conformally invariant tensorial quantities in a Finsler space with (α, β)-metric under conformal β-change.

In this paper, we prove that the Douglas space of second kind with generalised special (αβ)-metric is conformally invariant. In the consequence, we find some results to show that the Douglas space of second kind with certain (α, β)-metric such as Randers metric, first approximate Matsumoto metric and Finsler space with some generalised form of (α, β)-metric remains unchanged geometrically under a confomal transformation.

A Finsler space Fn = (M, F(α, β)) is said to be with an (α, β)-metric if F(α, β) is a positively homogeneous function in α and β of degree 1, where α is Riemannian metric given by α2 = aij(x)yiyj and β = bi(x)yi is 1-form. The space Rn = (M, α) is called Riemannian space associated with Fn. We shall use the following symbols [6];

The Berwald connection

of Fn plays an important role in this paper. Bjki denotes the difference tensor of Gjki and γjki that is

(1)

Using the subscript 0 and transvecting by yi, we get

(2)

and then Bji=̇jBi and Bjki=̇kBji. A Finsler space Fn of dimension n is called a Douglas space [14] if

(3)

are homogeneous polynomial of (yi) of degree three.

Next, differentiating (3) with respect to ym, we obtain the following definitions;

Definition 1.

([14]) A Finsler spaceFnis a Douglas space of second kind ifDimi=(n+1)GiGmimyiis a two homogeneous polynomial in (yi).

On the other hand, a Finsler space with (α, β)-metric is a Douglas space of second kind if and only if

(4)

are homogeneous equation in (yi) of degree two, when Bmm is same as given in [14].

Furthermore, differentiating Eqn (4) with respect to yh, yjand yk, we obtain

(5)
Definition 2.

A Finsler spaceFnwith (α, β)-metric is known as Douglas space of second kind ifBmim=(n+1)BiBmmyiis a homogeneous polynomial in (yi) of degree two.

Under this section, we discuss the criteria for a Finsler space with an (α, β)-metric to be a Douglas space of second kind [2].

The spray coefficient Gi(x, y) of Fn can be expressed as [4].

(6)
(7)

where

(8)

Since γ00i=γjki(x)yjyk is hp(2), Eqn (7) yields

(9)

By means of (3) and (9), we obtain the following lemma [14];

Lemma 1.

A Finsler spaceFnwith an (α, β)-metric is a Douglas space if and only ifBij = Biyj − Bjyiare hp(3).

Differentiating (9) with respect to yh, yk, yp and yq, we can have Dhkpqij=0 which are equivalent to Dhkpmim=(n+1)Dhkpi=0. Hence, a Finsler space Fn satisfying the condition Dhkpqij=0 is called Douglas space. Now, differentiating Eqn (9) with respect to ym and contracting m and j in the resulting equation, we get

(10)

where Ω=β2Fα+αγ2Fαα, provided that Ω ≠ 0, A=αFαFααα+3FαFαα3αFαα2 and

(11)

Following result is used in the succeeding section [7]:

Theorem 1.

A Finsler spaceFnis a Douglas space if second kind if and only ifBmimare homogeneous polynomials in (ym) of degree two, whereBmimis given byEqs (10) and (11), provided Ω ≠ 0.

In this section, we find the criteria for a Douglas space of second kind to be conformally invariant.

Let Fn = (M, F) and F¯n=(M,F¯) be two Finsler spaces. Then Fn is called conformal to F¯n if we have a function σ(x) in each coordinate neighbourhood of Mn such that F¯(x,y)=eσF(x,y) and this transformation FF¯ is called conformal change.

A conformal change of (α, β)-metric is given as α,βα¯,β¯, where α¯=eσα, β¯=eσβ that is,

(12)
(13)

and b2=aijbibj=a¯ijb¯ib¯j

From Eqn (13), the Christoffel symbols are given by:

(14)

Where, σj = jσ and σi = aijσj.

Using (13) and (14), we obtain the following identities:

(15)

Where, ρ = σrbr.

Using Eqs (14) and (15), we get easily the followings:

(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)

Now we obtain the conformal transformation of Bij given by Eqn (9).

Consider F¯(α,β)=eσF(α,β) then

(20)

From Eqs (8), (19), (20) and using Theorem 3.1, we obtain

(21)

Where,

(22)

Hence Bij can be expressed as:

Where,

Using Eqn (11), we can have

(23)

Now, we use conformal transformation on Bmim and obtain

(24)

Where, Kmim is given by [15, 16].

(25)

Therefore, we obtain the following result:

Theorem 2.

A Douglas space of second kind is conformally invariant if and only ifKmim(x)are homogeneous polynomial in (yi) of degree two.

Consider a Finsler manifold with special (α, β)-metric defined as

Where, ϵ and k are constant.

Then we obtain

(26)

Therefore, using Eqn (11), we obtain

(27)

Where,

Hence, using Eqn (26), Kmim can be reduced as

(28)

Where,

Now, Eqn (28) can also be written as

(29)

where,

showing that Kmim is homogeneous polynomial of degree 2 in yi.

Theorem 3.

A Douglas space of second kind with special (α, β)-metricF=α+ϵβ+kβt+1αt, whereϵandkare constants, is conformally invariant.

With the help of Theorem 3 it can be proved that a Douglas space of second kind with a Finsler space of certain (α, β)-metric is conformally transformed to a Douglas space of second kind. In this way, one can have following possible cases;

  • Case(i). If ϵ = 1 and k = 0, we have F = α + β which is Randers metric. In case, 2Kmim occupies the form

    (30)
    Which shows Kmim is homogeneous polynomial in (yi) of degree two.

Note that in this case, p1 = p2 = p3 = p4 = p5 = p6 = p7 = 0.

Corollary 1.

A Douglas space of second kind with Randers metricF = α + β, is conformally invariant.

  • Case(ii). If ϵ = 0 and k = 1, we have F=α+βt+1αt. In this case 2Kmim obtains the form

(31)

Where,

Showing that Kmim is homogeneous polynomial in (yi) of degree 2.

Thus, we can have following;

Corollary 2.

A Douglas space of second kind with special (α, β)-metricF=α+βt+1αtis conformally transformed to a Douglas space of second kind.

  • Case(iii). If ϵ = 1 and k = 1, we obtain F=α+β+βt+1αt. In the case, 2Kmim occupies the form

(32)

where,

Showing that Kmim is a homogeneous polynomial in (yi) of degree 2.

Thus, we obtain the following;

Corollary 3.

A Douglas space of second kind with special (α, β)-metricF=α+β+βt+1αtis conformally invariant.

  • Case(iv). If ϵ = 1, k = 1 and t = 1, we obtain F=α+β+β2α. Then, 2Kmim reduces in the form

(33)

Where,

Showing that Kmim is a homogeneous polynomial in (yi) of degree 2.

Thus, we can have the following;

Corollary 4.

A Douglas space of second kind with first approximate Matsumoto metricF=α+β+β2αis invariant under conformal change.

1.
Antonelli
PL
,
Ingarden
RS
,
Matsumoto
M
.
The theory of sprays and finsler space with application in physics and biology
.
Dordrecht
:
Kluwer Acad
;
1993
.
2.
Narasimhamurthy
SK
,
Ajith
,
Bagewadi
CS
.
Conformal change of Douglas space of second kind with (α, β)-metric
.
J Math Anal
.
2012
;
3
(
2
):
25
-
30
.
3.
Aikou
T
,
Hashiguchi
M
,
Yamauchi
K
.
On Matsumoto's Finsler space with time measure
.
Rep Fac Sci Kagoshima Univ (Maths Phys Chem)
.
1990
;
23
:
1
-
12
.
4.
Matsumoto
M
.
The Berwald connection of Finsler space with an (α, β)-metric
.
Tensor, NS
.
1991
;
50
:
18
-
21
.
5.
Park
HS
,
Lee
IY
.
Park
CK
.
Finsler space with general approximation Matsumoto metric
.
Indian J Pure Appl Math
.
2003
;
34
(
2
):
59
-
77
.
6.
Matsumoto
M
.
Theory of finsler space with (α, β)-metric
.
Rep Math Phys
.
1992
;
31
:
43
-
83
.
7.
Lee
IY
.
Douglas space of second kind with Matsumoto metric
.
J Chungcheong Math Soc
.
2008
;
21
(
2
):
209
-
21
.
8.
Bacso
S
,
Matsumoto
M
.
On Finsler space of Douglas type, A generalization of the notion of Berwald spaces
.
Publ Math Debrecen
.
1997
;
51
:
385
-
406
.
9.
Bacso
S
,
Szilagyi
B
.
On a weakly-Berwald space of Kropina type
.
Math Pannonica
.
2002
;
13
:
91
-
95
.
10.
Kneblman
MS
.
Conformal geometry of generalized metric spaces
.
Proc Nat Acad Sci USA
.
1929
;
15
:
376
-
79
.
11.
Hashiguchi
M
.
On conformal transformation of Finsler metrics
.
J Math Kyoto Univ
.
1976
;
16
:
25
-
50
.
12.
Lee
YD
.
Conformal transformations of difference tensors of Finsler space with an (α, β)-metric
.
Comm Korean Math Soc
.
1997
;
12
(
4
):
975
-
84
.
13.
Prasad
BN
,
Gupta
BN
,
Singh
DD
.
On conformal transformation in Finsler space with an (α, β)-metric
.
Indian J Pure Appl Math
.
1987
;
18
(
4
):
290
-
301
.
14.
Matsumoto
M
.
Finsler spaces with (α, β)-metric of Douglas type
.
Tensor, NS
.
1998
;
60
:
123
-
34
.
15.
Shanker
G
,
Chaudhari
D
.
On the conformal change of Douglas spaces of second kind with certain (α, β)-metric
.
Int J Pure Appl Math
.
2015
;
103
(
4
):
613
-
24
.
16.
Baby
SA
,
Shanker
G
.
On the conformal change of Douglas spaces of second kind with special (α, β)-metric
.
AIP Conf Proc
.
2020
;
2261
(
1
): 030011.
17.
Berwald
L
.
On Cartan and Finsler geometries, III, Two dimensional Finsler spaces with rectilinear extremal
.
Ann Math
.
1941
;
42
:
84
-
112
.
18.
Lee
IY
.
On weakly-Berwald space with (α, β)-metric
.
Bull. Korean Math Soc
.
2006
;
43
(
2
):
425
-
41
.
Published in the Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal