The study explored the relationship between self and informant reports of emotional problems in a forensic intellectual disability sample. The Emotional Problems Scales (EPS) (Prout & Strohmer, 1991), which comprises a Self Report Inventory (EPS‐SRI) and an informant Behaviour Rating Scale (EPS‐BRS), was routinely administered to 30 individuals with intellectual disability in a secure forensic setting, as part of a standard clinical assessment procedure. It was hypothesised that there would be a moderate relationship between corresponding scores on the EPS‐SRI and EPS‐BRS. However, there were no significant relationships between corresponding scales of the EPS‐SRI and EPS‐BRS, apart from the EPS‐SRI and EPS‐BRS scales measuring anxiety (r = .376, p<.05). The results continued to be non‐significant, even when positive impression management was controlled for. The findings suggest little relationship between self and informant ratings in a forensic intellectual disability sample, and therefore support the need to gather information from multiple sources when assessing such individuals.
Article navigation
21 June 2010
Review Article|
June 21 2010
The association between self‐report and informant reports of emotional problems in a high secure intellectual disability sample
Claire Lewis;
Claire Lewis
National Centre for High Secure Learning Disability Services, Rampton Hospital, Nottinghamshire, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Catrin Morrissey
Catrin Morrissey
National Centre for High Secure Learning Disability Services, Rampton Hospital, University of Lincoln, Nottinghamshire, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2044-1290
Print ISSN: 2044-1282
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2010
Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities (2010) 4 (2): 44–49.
Citation
Lewis C, Morrissey C (2010), "The association between self‐report and informant reports of emotional problems in a high secure intellectual disability sample". Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 4 No. 2 pp. 44–49, doi: https://doi.org/10.5042/amhid.2010.0320
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Assessing risk in services for people with intellectual disability
Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities (November,2012)
Aggression in specialist secure and forensic inpatient mental health care: incidence across care pathways
Journal of Forensic Practice (August,2013)
Trauma and post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in a high secure forensic learning disability population: future directions for practice
Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities (September,2010)
Pain experience and management in a forensic intellectual disability service
Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities (March,2014)
“Why can’t they be in the community?” A policy and practice analysis of transforming care for offenders with intellectual disability
Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities (May,2015)
Related Chapters
Women With Intellectual Disabilities: Unravelling Their Victim–Offender Status
The Emerald International Handbook of Feminist Perspectives on Women’s Acts of Violence
Blood Pattern Analysis in Blossom Hill Cottage
Custard, Culverts and Cake: Academics on Life in The Archers
Exploring interpersonal behavior and team sensemaking during health information technology implementation
Leading in Health Care Organizations: Improving Safety, Satisfaction and Financial Performance
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
